If you created a robot to worship you, wouldn't you be irritated if it did otherwise, of worse yet, worshiped your enemy?
The question is: who's to blame?
If you make a robot and give it the ability to worship your enemies, you're the one at fault. I know, I know... free will yada yada, but then you should be wondering what you're doing wrong to make your robots worship someone else.
Let's be honest here, god couldn't even manage to keep all his angels subservient to him. They'll know more about everything than humans do, and yet decided to leave god. From day 1 until present time in biblical terms, seemingly everything and everyone has gone against god. We must ask why.
In keeping with fadingCaptain's sentence, god also 'smashed the ungrateful to bits'. It got so bad at one time, he even destroyed every living thing on the planet, except for a few lucky individuals and some cows for sacrifical purposes.
My advice to god right now is that he shouldn't be so eager to smite us- after all, we're just humans- but instead should be looking at what he is doing wrong for so many many people, (and even angels), to turn away from him.
In this day and age I really feel god should appear on a tv show to gain some much needed publicity. I guess it's not so bad nowadays though, because he has seemingly given up on annihilating us- or more to the point - has left that in the hands of nature. Maybe he did learn after all.
But then again.. who's to say he has learnt? I mean, just because something isn't written down as being actioned by god, doesn't mean he has no hand in it. For instance look at the 10 plagues. As we are all taught from a young age, god got angry at the Egyptians, and caused 10 rather nasty plagues to deal with them. When we're a bit older we learn about the bubonic plague, but we're taught that was caused by rats, (disease carrying insects on the rats). Who are we to say it was rats? Why is that plague not also an action of god? Because nobody has written it down as being so?
The same can be said of floods, tornados, earthquakes, meteor strikes, mudslides, lightning and so on and so forth.
How does anyone here define an action of god versus an action of nature? Perhaps the next time there's a tragedy and lots of people die, we can be peaceful in the knowledge that they were just sinning scum anyway, and god dealt with them swiftly.
Of course, there is evidence to show god doesn't play a hand in things anymore - and that is "contest". You see, there's so many other gods, and yet despite his words, he doesn't strike down all those who worship those other [false] gods. Has he handed the gloves in?
The thing is personally, I have no call to just assume truth in middle eastern text. I am as pure an Englishman as any Englishman can get and have my own set of mythologies - such as George and the dragon, crop circles and mothmen. The hobgoblin is also British
I have no need for mythologies that were created for a whole different culture. god said it himself that his people were the israelites- not once did he state his care for europeans.
He is as much a 'foreign' god as allah, odin, abellio and zeus- and there is no sane reason for an Englishman to believe in any of them.