I don't believe they are facts , I know they are facts
Ancient Giants of America
- Thread starter river
- Start date
I don't believe they are facts , I know they are facts
So you consider the statement of a farmer in a
newspaper from the 1880s as a fact? All the photographs you dug up have been shown to be fakes, but you believe a 150 year old tabloid story?
How?
What evidence? The photos are faked, and the news articles are mostly from the 1800s. Your "expert" from the Youtube video is a stonemason with no knowledge of geology or American history.
So, again, what evidence do you have?
The best evidence and a through explaination and understanding is through Richard J. Dewhurst's book ,
The Ancient Giants who ruled America , 2014
Richard J. Dewhurst is an Emmy Award-winning writer of the HBO documentary Dear America : Letters Home from Vietnam. A graduate of NYU with degrees in journalism , film and Television , he has written and edited for the History Channel , the Arts & Entertainment Channel , PBS , Fox Television and Fox Films , ABC News , TNT , Paramount Pictures , and the Miami Herald
This is a documentary. Not evidence.
Richards book is evidence , at least some of it
No, Richard's book is a book. It no doubt makes reference to alleged evidence, but the book itself is not evidence.
Have you read the book ?
A book cannot be evidence, river.
Why not ? Especially since it is fully of recorded PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
Fully recorded where? Who has seen this evidence?
Ten skeletons "of both sexes and of gigantic size" were taken from a mound
at Warren, Minnesota, 1883. (St. Paul Pioneer Press, May 23, 1883)
A skeleton 7 feet 6 inches long was found in a massive stone structure that
was likened to a temple chamber within a mound in Kanawha County, West
Virginia, in 1884. (American Antiquarian, v6, 1884 133f. Cyrus Thomas,
Report on Mound Explorations of the Bureau of Ethnology, 12th Annual Report,
Smithsonian Bureau of Ethnology, 1890-91).
Oh, we're back to the reports from the 1800s.
Where are these skeletons?
How big is "gigantic?"
If 7'6" constitutes a "giant," then would you contend that Yao Ming is not human?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yao_Ming
No he is not. You're calling skeletons of people 7 foot 6 inches tall "giants." As in, non-human. Yao Ming is 7 foot 6 inches tall. Is he also non-human?
Be a bit more specific, river.