"I don't love the media but they are a product of us, it's not the other way around."
It's both: A shrill feedback loop.
It's both: A shrill feedback loop.
Watcher said:SouthStar, Sadaam most assuredly had WMD; at least chemical weapons, which as everyone knows, were used on the Kurds. Mustard gas, nerve agent and possibly cyanide were used to kill an estimated 5,000. Very unlikely that he had any nuclear capability - they would have found manufacturing facilities by now.
WMD could be chemical, biological or nuclear. Of course a chemical weapon might kill dozens or tens of thousands, so I suppose it is a semantic game to determine whether it is a "WMD".
I don't love the media but they are a product of us, it's not the other way around.
buffys said:I don't love the media but they are a product of us, it's not the other way around.
buffys said:We're hardly the victims here.
Watcher said:buffys
Here's a different perspective, on information pollution.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0510/p11s02-stct.html
Just as bad as when people are torturing and killing others in the name of their country. As you said. The manner in which he was killed was disgusting. But what we are seeing now is the revenge coming full circle. Goofy was right, they could have taken the moral high ground and not killed, shown that they were better than the US soldiers whose pictures have been plastered across our newspapers these last few weeks. Instead they took the same road as they and the US soldiers working in the prisons were and are on.orestes said:The manner in which he was killed was dispicable, truly showing the worst of human nature. How bad is it when people are beheading others in the name of God? Absolute maddness.
Now?It's becoming a tit for tat battle now