phlogistician said:
You worm, you really are wriggling now!
WTF are you talking about? What worm? Are you really that much of a pompous idiot asshole?
I posed questions that you have not answered.
There can be no legitimate discussion unless certain facts are established.
It appears to me your are just looking for things to argue about when I am trying to pose things we can agree about.
I posed certain questions for the purpose of understanding what you believe.
If you want legitimate discussion ceratin facts have to be agreed upon.
Of you simply want to rant and rave, by all means do not respond to these questions or respond with some sort of flame, insult, or snide
remark about me.
In order for me to know where you stand, all you have to do is agree or disagree.
If you agree, we can move on.
Otherwise, we can use legitimate points to support our position.
1. Fact: Charlie wrote comments openly questioning the 9/11 incident.
Choose:
A. Charlie did write such comments.
B. Charlie never wrote such comments.
Purpose: The reason I ask is because I am not sure whether or not you are aware that Charlie wrote the comments. If you are aware that he
did, we can move on. If you deny that he wrote those comments, then I thank you for your time. If you respond with insults, flames, sarcasm,
snide remarks, then I shall assume you choose B, are a total asshole, have no interest in legitimate discussion, and would thank you for your
time.
(Assuming you choose A)
2. Fact: Duendy admires Charlie for writing an article questioning the 9/11 incident.
Choose:
A. Duendy does admire Charlie for writing such comments.
B. Duendy does not admire Charlie for writing such comments.
Purpose: I am not sure if whether or not you are aware that duendy admires Charlie. If deny that duendy admires Charlie, there is nothing to
argue about. If you accept that Duendy admires Charlie, there can be debate.
For example, conmsidering the following position: To admire Charlie for this senseless.
There is no point in claiming that it is senseless for duendy to admire Charlie if you belive that duendy does not admire Charlie.
There is no point in claiming that it is senseless to admire Charlie for writing such comments if you do not believe that he even wrote such
comments.
Therefore, I asked you in the above to clarify whether or not you believe that Charlie wrote those comments, and whether or not you believe duendy admire Charlie. Again, if you do not answer these questions, I will assume you deny them, and have no intention of legitmate discussion. If you start throwing out insults and flames, I'll assume your only intention is to rant, bicker, and flame.
phlogistician said:
You are on your back foot, if you have to rely on such misinterpretation of your own posts!
What back foot? WTF are you talking about? All you seem to do is throw insults and flame. So I guess it ends here then. You have displayed every intention of skewing what I am saying, and no intention of legitmate discussion. Callimg me a worm and other names shows how screwed up you are in the head. I have no intention to have any discussion with a total scumbag who despite my attempts to have a legitimate discussion continues to insult insult insult rather state your position.
I have attempted many times to find out what exactly your opinion is. Instead of clarifying it, you come back with useless blabbering and insults. Go screw yourself. You do not belong in any decent discussion. A troll is nothing but a decrepit nutcase who knows nothing but insults and mockery. I can easily do the same thing if that is what you want. Get lost, and burn in your own flames. Sad really.
