actor Charlie Sheen questions '9/11'

[Communist Hamster]

dont be like that you idiot, the people who have there own conspiratories are not idiots especially in cases like these where there are obvious flaws in the story. Stupid theories are ones which read like, aliens came and blew up the wtc buildings

Define a sensible 9/11 conspiracy theory.

 

[duendy]

Define a sensible 9/11 conspiracy theory.

whell it aint the one YOU believe...!
i truly feel and i am not being just bitchy, that you and co have KIND OF PERCEPTION that filters out connecting patterns.....it is frustrating. cause you deny. and we have this ordeal of having to constantly remind you of stuff you are not aware of--accidentally on purpose/ and/or unconsciously

 

[wesmorris]

you may not have noticed wes morris but this thread is a long thread. you've just arrived. i sugest you read it and you will find...?

*sigh*

Your evasion and condescension sicken me. I asked a simple question. Why no explosions if the building was pulled?

Oh, and you may not have noticed du endy, but I posted on the very first page of this thread and have followed it to some degree throughout... and haven't noticed an explanation of the kind I requested.

If I had, I wouldn't have asked, jackass.

 

[duendy]

*sigh*

Your evasion and condescension sicken me. I asked a simple question. Why no explosions if the building was pulled?

me))))have already told ya. haul yer arse and check it out from threads i have made EFFORT to foreward throughout this thread

Oh, and you may not have noticed du endy, but I posted on the very first page of this thread and have followed it to some degree throughout... and haven't noticed an explanation of the kind I requested.

If I had, I wouldn't have asked, jackass.

oh ...ad hommy has arrived.
all i can say is. you have't cloked them have yu. look harder. MAKE effort

 

[spuriousmonkey]

We all looked carefully. Now put some evidence forward that you claim exists or just up your medication and make it all go away.

I guess that is all you have. You have to look carefully either with a mind high on drugs or by a mind who experienced a few drops on the floor when it was a baby.

 

[leopold]

i received an email concerning the questions i had about 911
to be honest they don't sound very 'scholarly'

Steve and Judy,

I presume the answer to the first question is that they could have been
set off in any order (under computerized control), but it made the best
impression to have them begin at the location of impact to preserve the
illusion that the impacts and the fires were responsible. Otherwise, it
would have raised many questions. As for the second, I presume that the
kinds of explosives (thermate, for example) could not be ignited merely
by fires, especially at relatively low temperatures, but required special
forms of ignition. If these answers are right, please endorse them; and
if they are wrong, please correct them, and then return this to XXXXXXXX.

Thanks.

Jim

the x's is where i blocked out my name.

 

[duendy]

We all looked carefully. Now put some evidence forward that you claim exists or just up your medication and make it all go away.

me)))your as "false" as your name 'spurious' means--which i imagine's why yo picked it.....ie., i do NOT believe you have looked. you just want me runnin round after you, repeating what IShere in tis thread if you look
And i a not ON fukin medication. i would not touch that shit!

I guess that is all you have. You have to look carefully either with a mind high on drugs or by a mind who experienced a few drops on the floor when it was a baby.

you silly little tinker. do you honestly imagine that alll people who are questioning the offical stories behind '9/11', '7/7' etc HAVEto be high on drugs. some are some aren't. For example i imagine scholars for 9/11 truthaint, and many of the vitims loved ones who want answers, toug propbably are on medication some of them, cause the shrinks were lining up to hook em!.....douby some of the high rakin people who are question ing it are. but depends what drugs you mean...clot. got anything intelligent to add btw??

 

[duendy]

i received an email concerning the questions i had about 911
to be honest they don't sound very 'scholarly'

Steve and Judy,

I presume the answer to the first question is that they could have been
set off in any order (under computerized control), but it made the best
impression to have them begin at the location of impact to preserve the
illusion that the impacts and the fires were responsible. Otherwise, it
would have raised many questions. As for the second, I presume that the
kinds of explosives (thermate, for example) could not be ignited merely
by fires, especially at relatively low temperatures, but required special
forms of ignition. If these answers are right, please endorse them; and
if they are wrong, please correct them, and then return this to XXXXXXXX.

Thanks.

Jim

the x's is where i blocked out my name.

Does this answer satisfy you?

 

[leopold]

Does this answer satisfy you?

to be honest no it does not

for example nowhere in the reply do they mention evidence
they do however say they 'presume'

another reason is why go through all the trouble of making wtc1 and wtc2 look believable then have silverstein screw it all up by saying 'pull it'?

third is the supposed explosives themselves
there is no mention whatsoever of the type of explosive used
they do however say 'for example thermite'

no the reply does not convince me nor do i beleive it will convince anyone else

 

[duendy]

to be honest no it does not

for example nowhere in the reply do they mention evidence
they do however say they 'presume'

another reason is why go through all the trouble of making wtc1 and wtc2 look believable then have silverstein screw it all up by saying 'pull it'?

third is the supposed explosives themselves
there is no mention whatsoever of the type of explosive used
they do however say 'for example thermite'

no the reply does not convince me nor do i beleive it will convince anyone else

I see. If this is how you feel having received their reply you MUST pursue it! Don't give up. Get back to them, with your further queiries--as you point out here-- and go on from there. and then foreward watever you recive

 

[spuriousmonkey]

you silly little tinker. do you honestly imagine that alll people who are questioning the offical stories behind '9/11', '7/7' etc HAVEto be high on drugs. some are some aren't. For example i imagine scholars for 9/11 truthaint, and many of the vitims loved ones who want answers, toug propbably are on medication some of them, cause the shrinks were lining up to hook em!.....douby some of the high rakin people who are question ing it are. but depends what drugs you mean...clot. got anything intelligent to add btw??

Is this your evidence?

 

[duendy]

Is this your evidence?

is WHAT my evidence.....?

 

[spuriousmonkey]

The evidence to support your extraordinary claims. The evidence that is supposed to exist when you look long and hard enough. A bit when you stare too long in the sun and you start seeing spots and claim they are UFOs.

 

[duendy]

The evidence to support your extraordinary claims. The evidence that is supposed to exist when you look long and hard enough. A bit when you stare too long in the sun and you start seeing spots and claim they are UFOs.

ohhh for uks sake. it is like reading last pge o a book and not bothering to either read rest or look at indeex. that's you.

as i said. why the hell have i got to take you by the hand and lead you to th links of this lohg thread...?huh? do it yo elf. there IS evidence. lots of it. but i doubt you'd twig even if you looked at them. i can smell yer attitude a mile off, and it comes with putting down other shit like UFOs. you people think you know it ALL and that why yer so dangerous. yip, dangerous. your apathy about this serious issue IS dangerous. as is your apathy about rising fascism in general

 

[spuriousmonkey]

It seems you are not paying intention. I've been pointing out the dangers of increasing facism in the US constantly and it actually has made people vomit out of annoyance. Strange you missed that. The evidence was overwhelming. But you can see the conspiracy behind WTC without evidence.

And actually, i didn't bother to read the middle part of your post, because you still can't bother to run your shit through a spell checker.

 

[wesmorris]

to be honest no it does not

for example nowhere in the reply do they mention evidence
they do however say they 'presume'

another reason is why go through all the trouble of making wtc1 and wtc2 look believable then have silverstein screw it all up by saying 'pull it'?

third is the supposed explosives themselves
there is no mention whatsoever of the type of explosive used
they do however say 'for example thermite'

no the reply does not convince me nor do i beleive it will convince anyone else

wtc 7...

yeah... and watching the videos man, I swear.. you've seen demolitions right? The way it fell looks like that's what happened, but every demolition I've seen is preceded by rings of big bangs around the building right before it falls. There is ZERO bang in the video. The explosions would have had to be big enough to see from pretty much any of the angles I saw it from.

so fire is the only other thing going on there as far as is evident, i suppose.

 

[duendy]

It seems you are not paying intention. I've been pointing out the dangers of increasing facism in the US constantly and it actually has made people vomit out of annoyance. Strange you missed that.

me))well err let me know name o thread etc, and i'll look?

The evidence was overwhelming. But you can see the conspiracy behind WTC without evidence.

me))))))haha.....ahhhhwhat does one say to this ironic mind fuker.....?dont mean you personally i mean what you SAY. can you ...not join-the-dots? can you not see that if they are as visciously rutless as i no doubt your revealing that such as what happened on 9/11 and 7/7 is also a very much possibility its connected with te...FASCISTs. what is blockin you about this? that they wouldn't kill their own? what...???

And actually, i didn't bother to read the middle part of your post, because you still can't bother to run your shit through a spell checker.

no its cause yer fukin lazy. which is why you wont checkou tem links in this thread and APPLY yourself. you is doing that about their corrution but about THIS corruption you havemassive blindspot. am waiting to find out why.

 

[spuriousmonkey]

You are the lazy one for not reproducing the essence of the evidence.

And I did click.

But let's not kid ourselves. In fact, I know you are not lazy, because you cannot present any evidence. That's obvious from seeing what your 'evidence' is.

 

[spuriousmonkey]

In fact this thread is going around in circles.

You claim something.

Other people ask you to back it up. You claim they don't look, and 'it' is obvious. Other people ask you to back it up.

Rinse and repeat.

 

[duendy]

In fact this thread is going around in circles.

You claim something.

Other people ask you to back it up. You claim they don't look, and 'it' is obvious. Other people ask you to back it up.

Rinse and repeat.

actually ...dahlin, EVERYTING goes round in circles, but---regarding you seemingly incomprehensible grasp of what i is tryin to tell ya.............let me repat. ye---there--ae--links ---in ---this---thread, that provide evidence. go find em. i you keep comin back with the empty yo are. well that's YOU. take responsibilty for what YO 'bring'.....