actor Charlie Sheen questions '9/11'

[leopold]

Hey leopold.
Exactly, because the collapse appeared to start at the point of impact, on the upper 1/6th of the building on the outside corner, there is no way that there was enough momentum to begin the rate at which the building collapsed from the top down.

Because the damage was done near the top of the building, each floor should have successively slowed the rate at which the building collapsed.....instead of the free fall fashion.

Leopold, what is your opinion of the the collapse of the 3rd building, and why it was purposely detonanted?
Thanks.

it didn't "appear" to collapse at the impact site, it did

it seems like each floor should have slowed the collapse but judging from what i know of the construction of wtc1 and 2 that may not be the case

i do not know enough about the construction of wtc7 to give an informed opinion about its collapse
i do know the southwest corner was damaged by either the aircraft or the collapse of wtc1,2. also fires burned inside the building for about 6 hours

 

[moementum7]

I don't know, didn't watch the movie, don't care,
I asked the question to know to whom to listen more.

Wow, Avatar.
You dont care?
Then why are you here?

FUCK MAN, think for yourself.

 

[moementum7]

Ok, thanks Leopold.


P.S. Larry Silverstein admits to having the 3rd building detonated.

 

[duendy]

I don't know, didn't watch the movie, don't care,
and any my opinion on this would be unqualified and most likely incorrect, because I study social sciences, not physics and engineering.
I asked the question to know to whom to listen more.

....answer. splash your face with cold water and slap it, and say: 'i WILL trust myself!'

 

[Avatar]

Wow, Avatar.
You dont care?
Then why are you here?

FUCK MAN, think for yourself.

I think you are awesome, that's why I'm here. Please continue your debate.
But it seems that none of you have any education in engineering (I know duendy doesn't), so you're most likely right - I should not be reading this thread.

ciao

 

[moementum7]

lol, thanks Avatar.

 

[leopold]

P.S. Larry Silverstein admits to having the 3rd building detonated.

really?
he said they planted explosives in building 7?

 

[moementum7]

really?
he said they planted explosives in building 7?

Ya man, crazy I know.
Check it out.
33 minutes in
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2794250058695002691&pl=true

We made the decision to "pull it", then we watched the building collapse."

 

[duendy]

see new video where Charlie Sheen challenges official 9/11 conspiracy theory
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/150406sheenchallenges.htm

 

[Hercules Rockefeller]

Is there some way we could herd all the 9/11 nutball conspiracy theorists together at once? Some sort of conference or convention, maybe? Then we could perform a controlled detonation of that building. Surely the irony will not be lost on the nutballs inside the building, and the collective IQ of society as a whole will increase substantially.

 

[duendy]

Is there some way we could herd all the 9/11 nutball conspiracy theorists together at once? Some sort of conference or convention, maybe? Then we could perform a controlled detonation of that building. Surely the irony will not be lost on the nutballs inside the building, and the collective IQ of society as a whole will increase substantially.

of course you mean, Bush and co and all the offical conspiracy spinners.....?

 

[wesmorris]

well, I've got an engineering degree, and have consulted with a couple of engineering types about it and as far as the two main towers go, the official explanation via ansii or whatever seems to jive. not sure about tower 7 though. did anyone die in it?

 

[leopold]

not sure about tower 7 though. did anyone die in it?

no, the building was evacuated

 

[duendy]

well, I've got an engineering degree, and have consulted with a couple of engineering types about it and as far as the two main towers go, the official explanation via ansii or whatever seems to jive. not sure about tower 7 though. did anyone die in it?

well, errr fine. BUT the crucial thing. what 'we' would all want to hear, in this serious critical debating arena, is you and/or your buddies face and challenge EVERY point which contradicts your sureities? otherwise what you've just said is fairly very empty in comparison with the people, including professionals in their fields who say otherwise, and DO make points, etc.
So....? we await....

 

[leopold]

for everyones information i have sent by email the following 2 questions to the website 911scholars for truth it's been about 3 weeks and as of yet i have heard nothing from them

the question were:
1. why did the collapse initiate at the impact site on both wtc1 and wtc2?
2. why didn't the fires set off the explosives?

as i said i have heard nothing from these people regarding these 2 questions
read into that what you will

 

[jax0509]

link

and for all of you here is the full interview

link

 

[wesmorris]

well, errr fine. BUT the crucial thing. what 'we' would all want to hear, in this serious critical debating arena, is you and/or your buddies face and challenge EVERY point which contradicts your sureities? otherwise what you've just said is fairly very empty in comparison with the people, including professionals in their fields who say otherwise, and DO make points, etc.
So....? we await....

How do you gather "sureities" from "seems to jive"?

Eh?

Did I say "I know what happened, blah blah blah"? No, I didn't. I said it seems to jive, and said I have no clue about building 7.

In the last half hour though, I've watched 7 or 8 different videos of the wtc 7 collapse, and don't see the telltale explosions that should be evident at a controlled demolition. I do not conclude however, that this is much evidence... rather, I just don't see what I'd expect to see if a building was "pulled". I've seen it numerous times on the scienced channel, and if my memory serves, every time there is a series of explosions that are rather obvious when a building is demolished. All around the building in a series from botom to top you see a big cloud over a like a second or two, depending on the building. Big, obvious, unhideable explosions.

I'm no demolitions expert, so since you're so serious about this, why don't you explain why you don't see it?

 

[duendy]

you may not have noticed wes morris but this thread is a long thread. you've just arrived. i sugest you read it and you will find...?

 

[jax0509]

Is there some way we could herd all the 9/11 nutball conspiracy theorists together at once? Some sort of conference or convention, maybe? Then we could perform a controlled detonation of that building. Surely the irony will not be lost on the nutballs inside the building, and the collective IQ of society as a whole will increase substantially.

dont be like that you idiot, the people who have there own conspiratories are not idiots especially in cases like these where there are obvious flaws in the story. Stupid theories are ones which read like, aliens came and blew up the wtc buildings

 

[Hercules Rockefeller]

the people who have there own conspiratories are not idiots

I disagree.

especially in cases like these where there are obvious flaws in the story.

Obvious flaws!

That’s hilarious. Who says there are flaws? You?

Some guy on an internet forum? Ah, the good ol’ internet. An endless source of validation for nutball conspiracy theorists of all kinds......

Stupid theories are ones which read like, aliens came and blew up the wtc buildings

They are stupider conspiracy theories. There’s an important distinction there. Did you catch it?