actor Charlie Sheen questions '9/11'

Status
Not open for further replies.
leopold99 said:
duendy
you are the one advocating the explosive theory. you are the one that is positive that explosives brought down wtc1 and 2

i asked you to explain an observation i made about the collapse
AND YOU CAN'T
in YOUR universe--wherever THAT is--i cant. i have already shown you shit. you have even HLPED me puttin links up.

conclusion. you are an el thicko. end of. what can i sayyyy?
you cant reason with someone who dont wont reason.
so, are you gonna take you --what must be obviously a question of supreme importance --to te scholars for truth?

i am gonna keep askin keep askin

well well welll. have you asked them yet? well, have you?? haha
 
So, why don't you look at the actual footage?
Or all they all fake made by Illuminati?
 
you are probably right though avatar
i can see duendy now, desparatly searching for a website that will explain my observation
there is none to be found duendy because it can not be explained by the explosive theory
 
duendy
watch the video of the collapse of both buildings
and ask yourself "how can i explain this by explosives"

and you have the gall to say you can't reason with me?

after watching the collapse you will say "look at those puffs of smoke"
"it's explosives i tell you"

do you even know what "open minded" means?
 
I'm a bit sorry for him though. For the ease of his mind he needs an environment that is in harmony with his "inner way of seeing the world". He can't put his mind in harmony with the world, so he tries to bring the world in harmony with his mind.
Needless to say this is an action in futility.
Duendy needs loving care and likeminded people around to feel good, without the reality getting into his view, but that just doesn't happen, so there is strife, frustration and damage to his nervous system.
Unfortunately like minded people can't provide him with that because they're in just a bad shape as he is. Quite a problem really. Maybe some rehabilitation or meditation centre, a buddhist temple that deals with curing such people.
 
duendy said:
i you have even HLPED me puttin links up.
and i will do so again, and continue to do so

duendy i am searching for answers like you are
but instead of jumping on the nearest bandwagon i ask myself how can i disprove what i am looking at
 
Avatar said:
I'm a bit sorry for him though. For the ease of his mind he needs an environment that is in harmony with his "inner way of seeing the world". He can't put his mind in harmony with the world, so he tries to bring the world in harmony with his mind.
Needless to say this is an action in futility.
Duendy needs loving care and likeminded people around to feel good, without the reality getting into his view, but that just doesn't happen, so there is strife, frustration and damage to his nervous system.

me))))thankyou doctor...mwhahahaha

Unfortunately like minded people can't provide him with that because they're in just a bad shape as he is. Quite a problem really. Maybe some rehabilitation or meditation centre, a buddhist temple that deals with curing such people.
'curing'
 
leopold99 said:
and i will do so again, and continue to do so

me)))very sporting of you.

duendy i am searching for answers like you are
but instead of jumping on the nearest bandwagon i ask myself how can i disprove what i am looking at
Good, ad actually respect that spirit....howEVER what you say doesn't impress me personally.
So, i suggest this. IF you think what you got is original and can clear up stuff then take it to te big boys and girls. try for example scholarsfor truth/....see link above. contact them. transmit their shock horror-reply at missing such a 'vital observation' and it might make the news, who knows.......
but seriously. do it!
 
duendy said:
Good, ad actually respect that spirit....howEVER what you say doesn't impress me personally.
why is that duendy? i'm not charlie sheen?
i bet if sheen said the same thing i did you would be lapping it up out of the gutter wouldn't you?

i am sorry my questions don't impress you but you must admit that they are valid and furthermore they haven't been touched upon by your hero sheen. nor have they been asked by any of these conspiracy sites.
why is that duendy? could the answer be that it will detract from the explosives theory? why hasn't sheen asked those questions. i am positive that he has watched the videos just like you and me have.
 
leopold99 said:
why is that duendy? i'm not charlie sheen?
i bet if sheen said the same thing i did you would be lapping it up out of the gutter wouldn't you?

m))what a charming metaphor...!
listen up. i admire Charlie Sheen, and many others do, and dig what he's pointing out--none here apprently tough tere has been a thread wit one or two sayting intelligent tings about 'war on terrorism'

me)))))))doesn't matter who tells you summats up, you cling to your denial. so oe is gobsmaked at your utter incompetent ignorance. you kepts coin at me wit your tang. and totally ignoring other stuff . what is one to do wit such a limited perspective but not respect it. IF you are so in aqae at your groundbreaking discovery which proves us ALL wrong, well then take the fkuer and get it checked out!

i am sorry my questions don't impress you but you must admit that they are valid and furthermore they haven't been touched upon by your hero sheen. nor have they been asked by any of these conspiracy sites.
why is that duendy? could the answer be that it will detract from the explosives theory? why hasn't sheen asked those questions. i am positive that he has watched the videos just like you and me have.
well ....he, like i said. you HAVE a computer dont you? it is in its main mode a WEB which swiftly connects. TAKE your idea to one of the grops yo think wrong and tell them ou discoery. what arrre you waiting for?
why d'ya keep struttin yer stuff in front of me? i am not interested/
 
Yo MUST-read, Noam Chomsky: Controlled Asset-of the New World Order
www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/april2006/060406chomsky.htm
maybe you area follower...whatever, see if you ca see a reflection of yourself in his stuff. where he will deny deny about possibility of 9/11 being an inside job......A critique i do have thoufgh about te critique of him is where autor berates his call for 'gun control and population control----------well i HATE guns. i hate the American gun culture very much. so i ctually agree in no guns. and population control. well i am sure authors criticism ismeaning the NWO idea of population ctontrol which is an elite wanting to snuff out thousandsof te 'useless eaters'. i am more into Indigenous ways od population control self-regulated, rather than centralized by some un-seen elite whi want a bigger fukin 'garden'

But yeah, read it. see how he denies stuff about 9/11 like i see here. cause i am sure many of you who do here follow te 'left' right? hah....read on:
"Noam Chomsky has...lashed out at the 9-11 truth movment and claiming any suggestions of government complicity are fabrications. The 'radical' Chomsky takes a position so deeply rooted in denial that it makes te staged 9-11 whitewash commission look like an honest stuy. He bellierently refuses to discuss any of the massive evidence proving government foreknowledge and participation in te crimes, claiming it wouod destroy activist movements worldwide.....In oter words, Chomsky is telling hs followers to ignore the evidence because according to him, none exists. However even if there is massive evidence, responsible activists should ignore it because it would be 'the end of he Left'....."

and Leopold....contacted ScholarsFor Truth, yet?
 
The existence of a conspiracy doesn't imply that WTC was brought down by bombs, nor does it prove anything else then that there was a conspiracy..
 
duendy
i have questions like everyone else about 911
two of the biggest are
1. the absence of debris at the pentagon
2. what exactly brought down wtc7

wtc1 and 2 are pretty well solved in my mind

as to the government "knowing" about aircraft into buildings
i am positive that they indeed knew that it would happen, eventually

the same for the anthrax attacks
the military knew for the last 40 years that such a scenario was possible
as a matter of fact the military conducted experiments in new york city in the 1960s to see just how such a attack would pan out.
 
spuriousmonkey said:
The existence of a conspiracy doesn't imply that WTC was brought down by bombs, nor does it prove anything else then that there was a conspiracy..
which means bloody what exactly...?
 
leopold99 said:
duendy
i have questions like everyone else about 911
two of the biggest are
1. the absence of debris at the pentagon
2. what exactly brought down wtc7

me))have you contacted schoalars for truthyet?
whay not, if you want to explore you questions? are you jusyt gonna sit on em?

and haven't you seen this Silverstein Answers WTC Building Charges www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2006/050106silversteinanswers.htm
?

wtc1 and 2 are pretty well solved in my mind

me))i know. i dont agree.

as to the government "knowing" about aircraft into buildings
i am positive that they indeed knew that it would happen, eventually

me)))how do you mean?

the same for the anthrax attacks
the military knew for the last 40 years that such a scenario was possible
as a matter of fact the military conducted experiments in new york city in the 1960s to see just how such a attack would pan out.
so yu see that, yet seem to deny what's in front of you?? the BIGGIE!
 
come on duendy you aren't stupid
and neither is the military

i suppose the military knew that airplanes could hit buildings when orville made his first flight

the same with anthrax or any other biological agent

and what do you mean "the biggie"?
 
I'm just curious to hear from some of those that seem to be overflowing with common sense, as to what they think brought down the trade centers.
Was it the weight of the plane, or the gas melting all of the steel structures within the building or something else.
Please share your wisdom.
After all, we know that there could be no corruption amongst the government or controlling bodies....not on your watch anyways.
So what was it?
Thanks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top