actor Charlie Sheen questions '9/11'

Status
Not open for further replies.
duendy said:
well do it. be brave like he is.....
but errrrr, we alredy have shown you shit an your blind TO it . see the difficulty..?
duendy do you see what you are saying?
yes i have watched the videos of the wtc1 and 2 collapse
i noticed that the collapse initiated at the impact site in both buildings
i ask you to explain that observation
you said i was dense

so in effect i have shown you "shit" and you are blind to it
 
leopold99 said:
duendy do you see what you are saying?
yes i have watched the videos of the wtc1 and 2 collapse
i noticed that the collapse initiated at the impact site in both buildings
i ask you to explain that observation
you said i was dense

so in effect i have shown you "shit" and you are blind to it
all i hve seen all day from you and co is words and nuthin but.....?
 
duendy said:
all i hve seen all day from you and co is words and nuthin but.....?
WHAT????
the evidence is right there duendy
watch the video, then watch it again and again
watch where the collapse starts
then come back here and say i have offered nothing
the plain and simple truth is duendy you can not explain the observed collapse by the bomb/explosive theory
 
Noting the great similarity of magical thinking in all types of human societies and eras of recorded history, some cognitive scientists suggest that these ways of thinking are intrinsic to humanity. Many articles in neuroscience have shown that the human brain excels at pattern matching, but that humans do not have a good filter for distinguishing between perceived patterns and actual patterns. Thus, people often are led to see "relationships" between actions that don't actually exist, creating a magical belief.

There is much current scientific research in cognitive science that supports this view. For example, people tend to seek confirmation of their hypotheses, rather than seeking refutation as in the scientific method. This is another example of confirmation bias. People are also reluctant to change their beliefs, even when presented with evidence, and often prefer to believe contradictory things rather than change pre-existing beliefs. This phenomenon is known as cognitive dissonance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking
 
leopold99 said:
WHAT????
the evidence is right there duendy
watch the video, then watch it again and again
watch where the collapse starts
then come back here and say i have offered nothing
the plain and simple truth is duendy you can not explain the observed collapse by the bomb/explosive theory
'READ ALL ABOUT IT!!!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!!!! Leopold99 Questions 9/11 Truth with :"WHAT???"
keep it up dude. its getting really funny. shame that this threads about something FAR moree serious.
 
Avatar said:
Noting the great similarity of magical thinking in all types of human societies and eras of recorded history, some cognitive scientists suggest that these ways of thinking are intrinsic to humanity. Many articles in neuroscience have shown that the human brain excels at pattern matching, but that humans do not have a good filter for distinguishing between perceived patterns and actual patterns. Thus, people often are led to see "relationships" between actions that don't actually exist, creating a magical belief.

There is much current scientific research in cognitive science that supports this view. For example, people tend to seek confirmation of their hypotheses, rather than seeking refutation as in the scientific method. This is another example of confirmation bias. People are also reluctant to change their beliefs, even when presented with evidence, and often prefer to believe contradictory things rather than change pre-existing beliefs. This phenomenon is known as cognitive dissonance.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_thinking
of course....the above doesn't apply to YOU....? oh i see. oh....
 
duendy said:
'READ ALL ABOUT IT!!!! READ ALL ABOUT IT!!!! Leopold99 Questions 9/11 Truth with :"WHAT???"
keep it up dude. its getting really funny. shame that this threads about something FAR moree serious.
did you watch the video of the collapse?
 
leopold99 said:
duendy did you watch the video of the collapse yes or no
Leopold ....fukc off

i can see right thru yer silly game

take your insistent silly quesys to scholarsfor truth. any more useless crap wannabe-interrogation about te obvious i am gonna ignore
 
duendy said:
Leopold ....fukc off

i can see right thru yer silly game

take your insistent silly quesys to scholarsfor truth. any more useless crap wannabe-interrogation about te obvious i am gonna ignore

look man to a point i agree with you about the fact that there is so much that seems dubious about the official story but if some-one disagrees with you then at-least argue properly with them rather than be like that
 
duendy said:
Leopold ....fukc off

i can see right thru yer silly game

take your insistent silly quesys to scholarsfor truth. any more useless crap wannabe-interrogation about te obvious i am gonna ignore
its all useless and crap that forces us to take a hard look isn't it duendy?

i want you to tell me and prove that the collapse of wtc1 and 2 did not originate at the impact site on both buildings duendy
 
thedevilsreject said:
look man to a point i agree with you about the fact that there is so much that seems dubious about the official story but if some-one disagrees with you then at-least argue properly with them rather than be like that
YOu answer the silly sod then. over to you......
 
duendy said:
YOu answer the silly sod then. over to you......

i dont want to argue with anyone, i have my own opinions i let others express theirs, i just dont tell them to fuck off
 
thedevilsreject said:
i dont want to argue with anyone, i have my own opinions i let others express theres, i just dont tell them to fuck off
well bully for fukin yu then?
 
duendy
you are the one advocating the explosive theory. you are the one that is positive that explosives brought down wtc1 and 2

i asked you to explain an observation i made about the collapse
AND YOU CAN'T
 
You see, duendy probably can't have conclusions (thinking disorder?) on his own, he needs a website, book, etc. to give him these, and the more magical thinking that conclusion suggests, the better, because it gives familiar and cosy territory to float in and have all the answers to everything, because nothing can contradict or prove wrong any of these "magical" answers. Of course, that's all just guessing without examining the patient.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top