actor Charlie Sheen questions '9/11'

Status
Not open for further replies.
duendy
you mentioned that people heard bombs going off at wtc1 and wtc2

can you explain the difference between a car backfire and a gunshot?
how do they sound different?

i am positive that these people did indeed hear explosions
have you ever heard a television set explode?
i seen the aftermath of one inside a trailer and it blew a hole right through the side

have you ever heard a water heater explode?

why is it so hard for you to believe that wtc 1 and 2 was brought down by aircraft?
there is no evidence whatsoever that says otherwise, none
 
leopold, duendy will always favour the conspiracy theory, over a realistic reason. As we know, there are plenty of things that will explode in a structure, and sound like bombs going off. I can't blame people for misinterpreting what they heard, in the panic, but sticking to that misinterpretation afterwards, when they have been offered an explanation becomes irrational.

Worse still are people who take those words, said in the heat of the moment, and twist them.
 
leopold99 said:
duendy
you mentioned that people heard bombs going off at wtc1 and wtc2

can you explain the difference between a car backfire and a gunshot?
how do they sound different?

me))ask a professional gunsmith!

i am positive that these people did indeed hear explosions
have you ever heard a television set explode?
i seen the aftermath of one inside a trailer and it blew a hole right through the side

have you ever heard a water heater explode?

why is it so hard for you to believe that wtc 1 and 2 was brought down by aircraft?
there is no evidence whatsoever that says otherwise, none
well first i am somewhat supreised at your position, considering tis you wove been helping meput out evidence at tis thread...? pretty surreal tis here place sciforums init. i mean. it is really only me defending her--when a MAAJORITYof people actually do believe it was an inside job. jest seems they aint @ sciforums
Now look Leopold. in order yto really be flexible regarding this INVESTIGATION, hounded asitis by false offical tales, quicly hidden evidence from scene of CRTIME etc etc ---the constant propaganda from media and so on. you have to constantly see bigger picture. dont JUST focus on bobs or errr tvs etc, see the whole of it as it dynamically reveals itself

FIRST let me refresh you'll about reports OF bombs. and PLEASEunderstand that professinal fireme most likley WILL be able to tell difference between exploding TVs, etc and real bombs......HAve you personally ever asked a fireman tis question? so here's it agin fo lazy phlo
9/11 Firefighters: Bombs and Explosions in te WTC www.whatreallyhappened.com/911_firefighters.html
also--if you'll are so very cnvinced we is all imagining it, even pofessional firemen and policemen who weere actually in the thick of it, te have a look at tis which includes mathematical calculation, dont just come to is debate wit empty word, please challenge tis calculations here. i will respect you more for taking tis seriously:
Proof of Controlled Demolition at the WTC www.attackonamerica.net/proofofcontrolleddemolitionatwtc.htm

@ www.propagandamatrix.com (top left) The former head of Star Wars missile defense program [Dr Robert M. Bowman]...has gone public to say that the offical version of 9/11 is a conspiracy teory and his main suspect for the attack is Vice President Dick Cheney.......Dr Robert Bowman said that pivately his military fighter pilot peers and colleagues did not disagree with his sentiments about the real story behind 9/11.
Bowman agreed that the U.S. was in danger of slipping into a dictatorship and stated, "I think ther's been nothing closer to fascism than what we've seen lately from this government."
[he] slammed the Patriot Act as having, "Done more to destroy the rights of Americans than all our enimeies combined"
Bowman trashed the 9/11 Commission as a politically motivated cover-up, "The 9/11 Commission...was a total whitewash" "There needs to be a true investigation... said Bowman.

meannnnnwhiiile....
checkout '9-11 Commission chair linked via oil ties to Osama's brother-in-law "Now you would think tat being a business partner of the brther in law and aleged financier of "Enemy No.1" would also be considered a bona fide "conflict of interest" particularly when your mandate--as part of te 9/11 Commission's work--is to investigate Enemy No.1
This commission chir, Thomas Kean also sits as co-chairman of te Homeland Security Project (HSP)


errrr, ANYthing stirred yet...??
 
DUENDY, references to 'explosions' does NOT equate to bombs. Those web sites take the eyewitness reports and twist them.

Now, find a reputable source, and see if you can find a reference to a bomb.
 
Those reputable sources you're talking about are but mere pawns in the claws of Illuminati,
no such source is allowed to publish anything about bombs.
sneers
 
phlogistician said:
DUENDY, references to 'explosions' does NOT equate to bombs. Those web sites take the eyewitness reports and twist them.

Now, find a reputable source, and see if you can find a reference to a bomb.
did your blinkered perception--as yushe--only focus on that link? no mention of the mathematical calulation link...no mention of Bowman believingit an inside job, no mention of chair of Commisssion being linked to 'enemy no.1' and OIL interests........if u was my student i'd BOOt ya sorry butt out of class, down the hall and out of school ground....!

now. ac hem......how do you mean 'distorted' what those witnesses --including professional witnesses say:

where are YOUR..friggin sources yu lazy pplod? A L L i CAN see of you is like some pantomime punter coming back and back and/ with ' Ohhhhh Noooooo they didn't!'...i mean...what te fuks THAT?? i gonna start totally ignoring your imput unless YOU shape up

show me ANY sources which back up your claim of 'distortion'.....
 
Avatar said:
Those reputable sources you're talking about are but mere pawns in the claws of Illuminati,
no such source is allowed to publish anything about bombs.
sneers
thought YUs were 'studying'....what isu studying. how to keep keepin on being blind in a world crisis?
how to be a critical flunker?
no, go on, tell me?
 
thought YUs were 'studying'....what isu studying. how to keep keepin on being blind in a world crisis?
how to be a critical flunker?
no, go on, tell me?
Glad to be of service.

At present I'm reading an article from the "American Journal of International Law" January 2005, Vol. 99 No. 1: "The International Court of Justice's Advisory Jurisdiction and the crumbling wall between the political and the judicial" by Michla Pomerance (Professor of International Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem).
 
Avatar said:
Glad to be of service.

At present I'm reading an article from the "American Journal of International Law" January 2005, Vol. 99 No. 1: "The International Court of Justice's Advisory Jurisdiction and the crumbling wall between the political and the judicial" by Michla Pomerance (Professor of International Law, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem).

Clearly a piece of zionist oppressive propaganda.
 
duendy said:
well first i am somewhat supreised at your position, considering tis you wove been helping meput out evidence at tis thread...? pretty surreal tis here place sciforums init.
why should you be surprised duendy?
at least i present BOTH sides of the arguement
 
Avatar said:
Right - wrong -> those are just moral categories.
what relativist nightmare scenario do you exist in monsiuer avataaar??

right let's see, using your principles. someone murders your mama, papa, daughter, son, sister,brother, friend...

well acording to YOUR creed it dont fukin MATTER who done it?...right?
 
yes, can't reverse death, therefore there is no gain in knowing the killer
revenge is a nonproductive activity
 
Avatar said:
yes, can't reverse death, therefore there is no gain in knowing the killer
revenge is a nonproductive activity
...right right. so let me ask you this, and i dont wnat no 'clver' dishonest answer which i will see thru quick.

Say yu have a small child. and you become aware that a tutor at the school she/he's at is a pedophile whoalso has a record of raping and killing children. what will you do when you kiss your child on the forehead and wish it good day at school?
 
Same as spuriousmonkey suggested, inform the authoroties whos' job is dealing with these matters, or, if there's not enough evidence, send the child to another school. Quite simple.
 
duendy said:
...hyeahhh, and then take wrooong side...?
how so duendy?
nobody has produced any evidence that bombs or explosives brought down wtc 1 and 2

answer me this duendy
why did the collapse initiate AT THE IMPACT SITE on BOTH buildings?
why didn't the fires set off the supposed explosives?
 
Avatar said:
Same as spuriousmonkey suggested, inform the authoroties whos' job is dealing with these matters, or, if there's not enough evidence, send the child to another school. Quite simple.
stop hidin behind him....you said there was no point in knowing the killer

so alright. he kills yur child. you dont want to know?...onelast answer cause i am tired of this rubbish
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top