the fetus shows no emergent properties of the human. it is not a life in the terms that a human is.
dna does not define a human either. that website galt purports to prove something is some sort arbitrary attempt at extrapolating unsubstantiated assumptions. dna does not think, it does not run, it is not conscious, it cannot learn to read, write, do math, ride a bike, play baseball, etc. fact is dna is not a person nor does it show any of the properties of the person. locating dna somewhere does not make something a person either. the fetus has dna, a stem cell has dna, and my hand has dna in it. fact is, none of these things are people.
galt i am sure you result in the death of things with dna everyday. how can you be such a murderer? sperm and an egg have dna as well. is not fertilizing an egg also an abortion
the analogy between a fetus and a brain damaged person it totally flawed. the fundamental premise is lacking. the fetus is not a person so it cannot be compared in this way. furthermore, i see no problem in taking a person off the ventilator or whatever and letting him die. there comes a point where people must realize the brain is too damaged, this person's is mind is gone. the only thing left is a shell. to keep that person alive in that manner is simlply selfish. i speak on this point from experience. my mom fell off a ladder and hit her head. sure we could have kept her alive longer on a ventilator and artificial nourishment, but doing so was only a selfish endeavor. she had been a coma for 3 months already and showed no sign of recovery. the doctors made it clear from the beginning her brain was no longer functioning. pulling the plug is the humane thing to do.
sorry hare, i was in a hurry this morning when i left for my lab.