I looked up the contents of old books pertaining to history, archaeology, philosophy and religion.
Ok, when I asked for a list I was actually requesting some specific works. Ultimately of course, given that this section is predominantly about religion, I was enquiring as to what religious works you spent time studying/reading. Have you read the quran, (koran), in full - or perhaps the enuma elish, the vedas, the book of shadows, rig veda americanas etc?
I am rather curious as to what areas you concentrated your focus on, and why you did so.
Again the same in regards to 'history'. Are we talking Roman history? Seriously ancient history, (Sumerians, Babylonians etc)..
As for 'intensive readings on science encyclopedias', do you have a solid grasp of scientific understanding? Again, what specific areas of science etc?
Sad to say, I was not confident enough in all my searches by books.
Confident enough of what?
So, I tried to listen to TV preachers, especially those who had opened a religious program with Q & A portion.
So you were at this time specifically looking for a religion to call your own? It's why I have asked for further information concerning what you read/researched. Why, having read poetry and science manuals - have you made this seemingly giant leap to religion salesman on TV?
I then realized that the Bible is sufficient as a guide for people's life here on earth and beyond his life on earth.
I wholeheartedly disagree with you, considering it little more than an interesting look at early man. While there is 'love each other', which certainly sounds nice - that can be got from watching Winnie the Pooh. Winnie the Pooh on the other hand is not full of drowned humans, dead children and disasterous plagues.
So why, given that Winnie the Pooh is just as sufficient a guide to life, if not more so, would you conclude that the word of ancient shepherds is better for you?
However, there is also a vast difference between considering some writing as a decent guide to life and becoming a religious fundie.
Even an atheist can sit down and consider the bible as having extremely smart advice in it, (such as: better to live on the roof than in a house with a quarrelsome wife), but there is no need to take that to extremes. How did you make the move from a book you consider as a "sufficient" guide to living one's life, to worship of a supposed entity that you can only guess about? It is most probable that the religion salesmen on TV sold it to you.
Many people misunderstood the messages of the passages in the Bible as far as their preconception is concerned.
That most surely is completely personal, and thus a serious issue with the bible itself. Your claims/interpretations of that book will be disagreed on by pretty much everyone. You might as a majority agree on some things, but by and large it differs person to person. What you're doing here is claiming yourself right, them wrong.. and that is the absolute pinnacle of ignorance. You are in no position to do such a thing given the circumstances.
Oh, it was an amazing events in my readings since as long as I objected the findings of Campbell about the Bible being erroneous and fictitious, what I got from listening to "The Old Path" and "Ask Soriano, the Bible answers" were sufficient and efficient to support the Bible as an authentic writings from men inspired by God.
What you're saying here is that you had given yourself an answer before ever reading that book or watching TV, and that you only needed to hear someone confirm your already established beliefs and you'd consider it right. You basically let yourself hear exactly what you wanted to hear. It's cute, but dishonest.