Dreamwalker said:But don´t people act on the basis of what was taught to them?
human have a brains , leave them or accept them...
why only (for you) the people who left them are the open-minded , those having a great life , others dont?
Dreamwalker said:But don´t people act on the basis of what was taught to them?
mis-t-highs said:if your happy being a believer then you will loose nothing, when you die, is the only time we will find out, I think, if your wrong and I am right, you wont know, you will be dead.
if your right and I am wrong, then thats great for you, you get to be with your master, and I will proberly say, oh shit.
firdroirich said:"You only possess that which you cannot lose in a shipwreck." Regardless of your beliefs.
The believer is he who fears not hell, nor covets heaven as El Ghazzali put it - by this you shouldn't really be expecting to gain anything either.
Sirius83 said:However, to my understanding, isn't worshipping to be on the "safe side" pretty much just using the religion, and as such a greater wrong than just not believing in God, yet living a just life? I for one will not follow a religion simply because of threats of what may happen if I'm not religious.
If at the end of the day I'm wrong, all I can say to God is look, I was wrong, but I don't believe in blind faith. I did live a good life, so hopefully that counts for more than simply believing blindly. If I get punished for that, well, so be it. I won't submit to some God because of threats.
EDIT
have you ever seen a dead man similing , happy, smell good (nothing like a smell from earth)?
Nope. They look like a dead body, devoid of life. They don't smell bad because the body is prepared before the funeral. And kept in cold storage if the funeral doesn't take place within the day, e.g. muslim rights.
7x7 said:human have a brains , leave them or accept them...
why only (for you) the people who left them are the open-minded , those having a great life , others dont?
andso what you prefer, to travel on a ship with captin to known destiny or alone to unknown Destiny?
if i have a slim chnace that i'm correct, then i should not risk.
thats my believes
first i see you are ready to risk , i'm not
second i have seen couple of them, they were happy and other smelled them i didn't
they were happy, smiling and they look like alive
7x7 said:i do have all of these and more..why you think religion keeps you away from it. why don't religions mix between them.
they all get a death smile, mind you it's more like a grimace.7x7 said:thats correct, i'm on the safe side
Originally Posted by mis-t-highs
if your happy being a believer then you will loose nothing, when you die, is the only time we will find out, I think, if your wrong and I am right, you wont know, you will be dead.
if your right and I am wrong, then thats great for you, you get to be with your master, and I will proberly say, oh shit.
have you ever seen a dead man similing , happy, smell good (nothing like a smell from earth)?
when you look at them , you say they are in other world?
this question for all...
Sirius83 said:Indeed, I am ready to risk, simply because it is what I feel is right. I'd rather think things through, be wrong about it and admit it, than following blindly because of some threat.
As for those bodies, they look at peace, usually because they die peacefully or because the funeral home made them presentable for the funeral. Nothing more, nothing less.
mis-t-highs said:they all get a death smile, mind you it's more like a grimace.
if you believe your on the safe side good for you, but quite honestly there is do safe side, your still dead.
and when I look at a dead person, I never say there in another world because they are just dead.
but I do try to celebrate there life.
the life of a human being, is one zillion times more important and more sacred, then any god or afterlife.
7x7 said:human have a brains , leave them or accept them...
why only (for you) the people who left them are the open-minded , those having a great life , others dont?
In the 1970s when Iran hosted the Asian Olympics, several mullas, including the late Ayatollah Khomeini, denounced the exercise as “a Jewish-Crusader conspiracy” to take Muslims out of mosques and into sports stadiums.
Some theologians are opposed to sports because it requires physical contact. And that, in a culture, which is uncomfortable with the human body as such, is always a source of alarm. Iranian mullas, for example, have tried for decades to ban free-style wrestling, a sports that has a history of 3000 years in the country, because of fears that it might encourage homosexual tendencies between adversaries whose almost naked bodies are bound to touch in the course of a match
Some Muslim despots fear sports as an activity that could open spaces beyond the control of the regime. They are also uncomfortable with sports stars whose popularity could nibble at the prestige of the “supreme leader"
The concept of dignity in America is individual. Ours is collective. What I mean is that an American sees himself as an independent unit within a whole. We see ourselves as dependant units that make a whole. Our dignity is that of our leader, not ours individually. How else could you explain the presence of so many who are actually willing to die for a man like Moqtada Sadr
Repo Man said:An excellent refutation of Pascal's Wager is provided here.
There are more problems: if you back the wrong god in the race you're going to go to hell anyway, so all your time and effort believing was wasted.Jan Ardena said:the reality of the wager [Pascal's], namely one Almighty God as described in all bona-fide religious scripture.