Do engineers count, or does it have to be physicists?
Engineers count.
Do engineers count, or does it have to be physicists?
Engineers' count russ, so your point?
Jesus, river, I do sleep!Engineers' count russ, so your point?
Jesus, river, I do sleep!
My point is that I'm an engineer and I've been on three "ghost tours". So now you know of at least one sciencey type who has toured a haunted house (a bunch).
Don't bother (although his latest reply "prove it", post #25, should give you some idea of his sincerity - or lack of).Do engineers count, or does it have to be physicists?
Don't bother (although his latest reply "prove it", post #25, should give you some idea of his sincerity - or lack of).
River has, over the years, participated in a number of threads where scientists/ physicists have been listed as as investigating "ghosts" and "haunted houses".
But, conveniently, he manages to forget each time the subject comes up [1].
Regardless of what you say he'll shift goalposts - or even subject - and stick with what he believes.
1 This attitude extends to just about anything where he's challenged: most recently I've had to list authors/ books I've read to show how I don't limit myself to accepted science and have a knowledge of the woo stuff too. On no fewer than 3 separate occasions in the last 6-9 months or so he's denied having been told that and asked again for me to provide a list.
No.And...
Oh by the way what places and prove that you were actually there.
Ah, assumptions again...your self absorbed bitterness.
The question may well have been "legitimate" (although unwarranted): but your response (regardless of what Russ posts) won't be.I asked Russ a legitimate question like it or not.
Dywyddyr
Don't track this thread with your self absorbed bitterness.
I asked Russ a legitimate question like it or not.
The question may well have been "legitimate" (although unwarranted): but your response (regardless of what Russ posts) won't be.
You mean as distinct from you asking your meaninglesss agenda laden questions, to constantly try and discredit science and promote your own ridiculous fairy tale beliefs?Lets just keep this thread on topic. Shall we.
If you want to start another thread about what ever then do so. If not then , SHUT the****Up.
You mean as distinct from you asking your meaninglesss agenda laden questions, to constantly try and discredit science and promote your own ridiculous fairy tale beliefs?
Go take a bath river!
It is the questions that evolve science.
You mean as distinct from you asking your meaninglesss agenda laden questions, to constantly try and discredit science and promote your own ridiculous fairy tale beliefs?
Go take a bath river!
The question may well have been "legitimate" (although unwarranted): but your response (regardless of what Russ posts) won't be.
On your record it was not warranted.The question to Russ is warranted.
Notice he said "NO".
On your record it was not warranted.
And I also among most reasonable level headed people on this forum, would also have answered NO, to such a well known anti science, pro pseudoscience, Idiot.
I certainly rank Russ's honesty in what he claimed above your own unsupported nonsensical agenda and lies.
No was the answer to your rather trollish, agenda laden question, that you know you would have questioned anyway, if he had of decided to give you the proof your unwarranted question asked for.No was the answer. Rather honest by Russ.