911 Investigation

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lucysnow said:
Yes yes I hate and you're the benevolent serious thinker. A humanist, lover of nature clearing the world of evil from her keyboard and unraveling the complexities of world events with her extraordinary erudition. :eek:

me))yeah, and yur A sarcastic git. what's new

...hey where did you ever get the idea I was homophobic? :bugeye:

me)))and a joke

You project too much sunshine. For someone so full of love and joy you sure seem venomous. Now remember FIVE TONS OF FLAX!

me))i give what i receive sweeti pie. have had nuthin but BS from YU since the first day we met. unfortunately you dont seem tp be able to communicate ny other way. you who are 'out there in the 3rd world' -ish, INT LARNT nuthin. IS U PROUUD??

She probably thinks she's rikki tikki tavi:

me))))whose ya talkin to now flame thrower? thread disrailer huh? huh?

"This is the story of the great war that Rikki-tikki-tavi fought single-handed, through the bath-rooms of the big bungalow in Segowlee cantonment. Darzee, the Tailorbird, helped him, and Chuchundra, the musk-rat, who never comes out into the middle of the floor, but always creeps round by the wall, gave him advice, but Rikki-tikki did the real fighting. He was a mongoose, rather like a little cat in his fur and his tail, but quite like a weasel in his head and his habits. His eyes and the end of his restless nose were pink. He could scratch himself anywhere he pleased with any leg, front or back, that he chose to use. He could fluff up his tail till it looked like a bottle brush, and his war cry as he scuttled through the long grass was: "Rikk-tikk-tikki-tikki-tchk!" :D

you and riki tiki...go an rick yourselves.

ps. FIRST thing you do, is speak out, if nothing else. cauurse thick dense sod like you dont know that hey? hey
 
i think a better line of investigation would be who the fuck is Dr jones. what is his interest in proving thermite as a cause of collapsing towers.
 
duendy said:
you and riki tiki...go an rick yourselves.

ps. FIRST thing you do, is speak out, if nothing else. cauurse thick dense sod like you dont know that hey? hey

come on Dwendy, be nice.

Also, Dwendy i'm having trouble deciphering the British slang.

Sod= something bad.
SoftLad= ?????, never heard that.
 
Alejandro said:
this is why the children are soooo smart :bugeye:

Deleted: reson=adhom-Alejandro. :(


MORE startling discoveries:

Last week: Dont drink coffee, it causes heart attacks.
This week: Drink coffee its good for ya.

Last week: chocolate is killing ya fat ass
This week: Chocolate is good for you.

See wah i sayin?

Dwendy???
haven't a bleedin CLUE what trivia you are saying, and WHY you is sayin it in my thread....? could you go away and maybe grow up, maybe?
 
phlogistician said:
Duendy, if there were still fires burning weeks after the event, that has NOTHING to do with Thermite, as Thermite is FAST conflagration, and would burn out in seconds, not WEEKS. Thermite does not explode either, it is fast CONFLAGRATION, not EXPLOSION. But prolonged exposure to jet fuel, and the usual smouldering would account for it.

me))said in the notes i gave you above, "There were no infernos in either of the twin towers before they collapsed so what caused the hot spots deep in the wreckage?"
Are you trying to say a physicist would not know that temite connection could do this and not jet fuel?

You still have no explained the 'explosions' heard.

me)))))if there WERE explosions its proved you wrong ANYhow...softlad!..haha

I repeat, Thermite is an incendiary, not an explosive.

me)))heard ya first time, and i said that i had see an explnation tat if it is round down enough it DOES explode. but i aslo said that as WELL as termite that coulda beenused to cut thru metal columns etc OTHER explosive devices could have been used.

I don't care if Jones keep saying jet fuel is not enough to weaken the structure, because any fire, even without jet fuel, is enough! (and before you question this, I had to do a basic firefighting course as part of a previous job, because of the environment I worked in, so go do similar before questioning, eh?)

me))))look phlo jo, i am not pretentious. comin here pretending to be a firefighter and know all about tis stuff like you do.
Lke one minute you QUESTIOn firefighters ability to KNOW when they hear explosions, next YOUR tiny experience somehow qualifies your knwoing ALL the 911 truth movement dont. i call that arrogance. which you are famous for in ALL subjects. i am listening to a VARIETY of reports, inlcuding video footage , and pictures all sugesting you are an isolated case

Here's a report from a structural engineer. Not that you will trust it, but anyway;

http://www.civil.usyd.edu.au/wtc.shtml

me)))ONE structural engineer...? wonder who he's workin for? Bush's commison-tohide-the-truth no doubt!

Oh, and there IS NO EVIDENCE to support the Thermite theory, duendy. Jones does not list ANY in his paper. Go read his paper. Now what has been written about his paper, but HIS paper. You will see he offers NO EVIDENCE.

me)))))and errr what EVIDENCE you got big shot? i aint seen anything but words. NOEof the essntial points i made effort to note have you painatakingly answered. all pointing topresenceof THERMITE

Duendy, Kerosene burns at 2000 DegC+. Nearly as hot as the Thermite reaction and there were tens of thousands of gallons of jet fuel. Don't you think people would have noticed a similar volume of Thermite mixture strapped to the supporting structures of the WTC ;-)

me)))))but as we see in video most of the fuel explodes OUTside towers. in that report-link theres a demo which shows how quick thermite can dissolve metal engine, yeah?
look duuuude. fellow. EVERYTHING is pointing to inside job. give it up. you'll burst a blood vessel rying to save your ideal western american dream. which has completely shattered.
i can see your in denial. and not only about this......hmmmmmmmmmmm!
 
but as we see in video most of the fuel explodes OUTside towers.

If little old me is permitted to ask a question:

Herr Duendy,

How much fuel does one of those jets carry? :)
 
duendy said:
What caused the steel to melt?
How did it stay molten for weeks after the collapses?
How did fires in the WTC wrecakage manage to burn for THREE MONTHS?

THERMITE povides a plausible answer.
A thermite reaction generates extraordinarily high tempratures (>2500degrees C) and provides a CREDIBLE explanation fro te fires, hot spots and MOLTEN STEEL (a BY PRODUCT of the thermite reaction) found in the collapsed buildings--they were a result of thermite detonations in te buildings' basements on 9/11'
It's possible the steel never melted. It was glowing from heat, which someone mistakenly characterized as molten, having little experience with blacksmiths one can presume.

The fires burned because there was alot to burn in an office building.



Warning signs about this attack were clearly ignored, this is where the conspiracy is. There may be a second issue regarding our response to the attack, which seems delayed. Various groups are constantly trying to attack the US, and all one has to do to get justification for some military action, is to let things happen.
 
Last edited:
I remember it stated that Aluminium was used in the upper flaws of the towers. This was because at the time of manufacture the emphasis was on keeping the upper flaws light as the entire towers height was a great weight upon it's foundations. If it was made purely out of steel structuring, then the towers would never have been so high.

I've seen something on the television about how buildings react during Tremors, one particular one to me was interesting. It involved a building in Japan that had the builders go bankrupt part way through being build, So the last couple of flaws were cheaply constructed on the building using cheaper materials. The lower part of the building was designed to withstand tremors, the cheap part was not.

During a tremor, the top two flaws collapsed on the building. The reason they collapsed was they shook differently to the rest of the building.

It could be extrapolated that the towers with their aluminium structure above the place of impact began melting downwards and as soon as the floors started collapsing it generated a gravitation of momentum and force. Since with each floor that gave way would increase mass, it was unfortunately unstoppable and inevitable.

No bombs, no extra conspiracy plots.
 
Stryder said:
It could be extrapolated that the towers with their aluminium structure above the place of impact began melting downwards and as soon as the floors started collapsing it generated a gravitation of momentum and force. Since with each floor that gave way would increase mass, it was unfortunately unstoppable and inevitable.

Indeed, and the bottom structure was designed to hold up a static mass, not a falling mass.
 
personally i have no interest in conspiracy or illuminate or 911, but i did read the report when i posted the link for duendy. the one thing that i did notice and that i thought was significant was the photgraph of the fireman and the steel post behind him. the report pointed out how the post had been cut and not like crumbled or collapsed. does anybody know what would make a post look like it had been cut in such a way?
 
Bah, just reading up on this makes me feel depressed. All those people killed... and for what?
 
leopold99 said:
why does themite provide a plausible answer duendy?

you do realize that the heat generated by thermite is released in a fraction of a second don't you?
okay, this shows you how much i know about thermite
i have been reading about thermite and the above qoute by me is erroneous.

since there were explosions heard at wtc1 and 2 i assumed that thermite exploded. it doesn't

duendy i have noticed that you are evading my questions. why is that?

back to the thermite
thermite is ignited by magnesium
and thermite does not explode

duendy you are sure thermite is responsible for the molten metal found at wtc 1 and 2. why is that? you read it on a website? steve jones said it? or ahem sheen said so?

okay duendy answer these questions
since thermite doesn't explode and it isn't set off by explosives what were the explosions that were heard?
what was the nature of the 'squibs' that were seen

and of course one of my original questions remain unamswered and that is why did the collapse of both buildings initiate at the impact site
 
s0meguy said:
I guess we'll never know for sure...
do me a favour....that attitude's a cop out. it is great for fascists to say that and look into the distance with big daft dreamy eyes!
 
leopold99 said:
okay, this shows you how much i know about thermite
i have been reading about thermite and the above qoute by me is erroneous.

since there were explosions heard at wtc1 and 2 i assumed that thermite exploded. it doesn't

duendy i have noticed that you are evading my questions. why is that?

back to the thermite
thermite is ignited by magnesium
and thermite does not explode

duendy you are sure thermite is responsible for the molten metal found at wtc 1 and 2. why is that? you read it on a website? steve jones said it? or ahem sheen said so?

okay duendy answer these questions
since thermite doesn't explode and it isn't set off by explosives what were the explosions that were heard?
what was the nature of the 'squibs' that were seen

and of course one of my original questions remain unamswered and that is why did the collapse of both buildings initiate at the impact site

first off leopold ...notice soemthing hillariously ironical...? that you are trying to win this argument by argueing bombs DIDexplode which DEFEATS your argument. total contradiction.....!!

as i said to phlo....MAYBE two kinds of bombs were used.....? i also read that thermite can explode when it is ground up very fine.
about your everlasting question. have you not pusued this question with te scholars for truth like i suggested? have you tried anothe soude. comon dude.....make an effort.
it is obvious you have no understanding whatsoever for the HUGEEEEE clue of occultic signature over everything. spose now you'll pick up ya shirttails an do a runner

so what we got? you NOW seem to agree there WERE explosions....yes? which means an inside job, no?
when the intelligent person clicks about the OCCULT signature......welllll! what mo d'ya bleedin NEED?
 
and let me add another iomportant issue to do with all this horror, which i haveheard lately. New Yorkers affected by the atrocity have been even FURTHER abused, and utterly tramatized, and LIED to----by NYC mayor Guiliani....about the toxic dust caused by the atrocity! Firemen, service workers, people, tourists, schoolchidren, etc have died and are dying yet were notwarrned about/lied to about the extremely toxic dust whioch many breathed in oblivious!
 
and......the Patriot Act. written up BEFORE 9/11. unleashed POST 9/11. you know...when all are truamatized to fuk, and as is the fascist tactic--easily manipulated via staged trauma!
read about the freedoms gone, and rthe now very real potential for out and out fascism. cause its LAW!
http://911research.wtc7.net/pot911/legislation/usapatriot.html

and checkout your 'new police force'!
Unfathomed Dangers in PATRIOT Act Reauteorizatin - by Paul Craig
http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=8434
IF you'll think i am smug about this. like i am no some buzz trip to win an argument, your wrong. i am deeply overwhelmed by all tis shit BELIEVE it. but what does my head riiight in is when yo people cannot see what's in your face

and ellion. i don't dig how you can call yourself a 'freedomfighter'--in your details if, as you confess you dont realy care about 911 and Illuminati/Globalists.....?
i promise i aint gonna brow beat you, but i am curious how you can be so indifferent to all that and what is happening
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top