9/11 was an inside job

Status
Not open for further replies.
But where else am I going to satisfy my need for red writing?


Grill instead?


The problem with reality is that sometimes people like to live in the realm of fantasy.


Wow, for a brief second there, I considered driving a nail deep into my mid brain and hoping the Truther's win.. It has come to this.:bawl:


Well, you're hardly going to get my vote after that!



Only works if it is Irish.


Considering this is the internet after all, and this is a forum and the conspiracy forum (insert my going oooooooooooooooh here), I don't think any of them would be fit enough to even try that...

'allo it's happening. The BOXCUTTER CONSPIRACY THEORISTS are preparing to yellow belly out of the argument.

They cannot deal emotionally with the FACTS that have been put to them and so they need to run away so that they don't have to handle the arguments. Their counter argument is so pathetic that they have to ban anyone who makes them THINK.

T'was ever thus. It's called COGNITIVE DISSONANCE

By the way I would like to point out that ALL the posters on here with the exception of FatFreddy and myself have been Ad Hominem attacks. They think that this has some kind of effect, well it does. It makes me feel superior. BCTs are devoid of reasoned argument.

You know that you're over the target when you start getting the flak.
 
You know that you're over the target when you start getting the flak.

And you find using terms like yellow belly etc not flak?
Right from your opening post, your style has been arrogant, abusive, insulting and childish to put it mildly.


The myriad of U tube videos and individual unsupported statements and other scraps of pedant rubbish you supply, is far outweighed by the evidence for the attacks as officially detailed.

Let me remind you again [even though you have me on ignore] Forums like this are a godsend to conspiracy nutters and other paranoid individuals.
What you scream about here, what you plaster this forum with, whatever claims you promote, remain here.
It's not going to change anything...There will be no new enquiry...when you and the other nutters finally kick the bucket, so to will your nutty claims.
 
Please note that the following member's posts are on IGNORE.

Grumpy
MacGyver1968
Billvon
paddoboy

The reason for this is because all of these members have admitted that they refuse to read the posts I make.

I'm merely returning the compliment.

I know they're responding because they are very kindly regularly bumping this thread to the top of the New Posts list. This continuous publicity for this thread is to be encouraged.
 
Last edited:
The impossible case of United Airlines 175.

You would wonder why a forum that calls itself a Science Forum would not want to discuss this (even to rebut the claim), but would rather discuss me.

That's because they can't and think that making Ad Hominem attacks on me is, in their minds, making some kind of reasoned response.
 
Last edited:
Again, it's time to close the thread. The antagonist in this story is not willing to debate the issue, and it's turning into a propaganda screed.
 

Mod Hat
Again, Roscoe, kindly stop posting videos as your primary source of argument... either make an argument yourself, or let the thread die.
 
Roscoe has finally deteriorated to the point all such...unfortunate people who have no brains reach when confronted by facts and logic. He's just advertising his favorite Troother septic tanks on our nice clean forum, and the smell is terrible. He's done here, we don't give those who fail to listen or engage a platform, it's embarrassing. He's put everyone who fails to fall for his barnyard fertilizer on ignore(he says, but you can't believe a word he says)so it's time to put him on the ignore list for the whole forum. He posts nothing but woo, let him do that somewhere else.Permanently.
 
Seconded, regrettably. I'd go the further of suggesting that his posts just be deleted, since he sees the forum as nothing more than a water-carrier for nonsense.

I'd be happy to debate him - but it's clear he's not one for that sort of thing.
 
By the way I would like to point out that ALL the posters on here with the exception of FatFreddy and myself have been Ad Hominem attacks.
You do realise that this whole subject is like an ad hom on people's intelligence, yes?

These arguments from the 'truther's' have been identical for years. All unproven and all based on conspiracy theories that simply do not add up.

They think that this has some kind of effect, well it does. It makes me feel superior. BCTs are devoid of reasoned argument.
If you feel superior, it will be solely in your own imagination.

You know that you're over the target when you start getting the flak.
Nah. You are getting flak because you have not presented anything new or anything that could even remotely persuade anyone to believe as you do.

You have yet to determine what happened to those who were in those planes, for example. Where are they? Being held somewhere? What other evidence you have reads like fiction and has no basis in fact.
 

Mod Hat
Again, Roscoe, kindly stop posting videos as your primary source of argument... either make an argument yourself, or let the thread die.

Can't deal with them huh?

Tell you what I'm gone.

It's pointless casting pearls before swine anyway.

Do your worst. Bye bye!!!!
 
Can't deal with them huh?

Tell you what I'm gone.

It's pointless casting pearls before swine anyway.

Do your worst. Bye bye!!!!

Indeed, people here have been fruitlessly throwing evidence your way in the hopes you would actually listen to facts and reality. It isn't a matter of being unable to "deal with them", it's a matter of actually making a valid argument, instead of regurgitating several already defunct arguments and trying to make them seem like something new.
 
Can't deal with them huh?

Tell you what I'm gone.

It's pointless casting pearls before swine anyway.

Do your worst. Bye bye!!!!

The GRAND TRAMPLING EXIT. (Soon to be followed by THE TRIUMPHANT RETURN in which he claims to have NEW Youtube videos and conspiracy websites to prove his case!)
 
Their evidence is crap, why were there no shock waves? Explosions always have shock waves, that's how they work.
 
Indeed, people here have been fruitlessly throwing evidence your way in the hopes you would actually listen to facts and reality. It isn't a matter of being unable to "deal with them", it's a matter of actually making a valid argument, instead of regurgitating several already defunct arguments and trying to make them seem like something new.

Oh they've been fruitlessly throwing evidence at me have they.

Right. What's the title of this thread?

911 Was an Inside job.

So what does that mean?

Think about it.

Now look at this.

6-4ba.jpg


WHERE'S THE FUCKING PLANE????????

INSIDE?

WHO TOLD YOU THAT?


AY?

THE SAME PEOPLE THAT TOLD YOU THERE WERE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION.

YOU REVEL IN THE FACT THAT YOU HAVEN'T BOTHERED TO READ THE REBUTTAL TO YOUR IDIOTIC THEORY AND THEN TRY TO DICTATE TO ME>

WHAT'S THE POINT?

I HAVE NOTHING BUT UTTER CONTEMPT FOR YOU ALL.
 
"AT ANY GIVEN MOMENT, THERE IS A SORT OF ALL PERVADING ORTHODOXY,
A GENERAL TACIT AGREEMENT NOT TO DISCUSS LARGE AND UNCOMFORTABLE FACTS."


- George Orwell

Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which he lives is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one's self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.

MICHAEL RIVERO


AND LASTLY TO THE PEOPLE ABOUT TO REMOVE ME FROM HERE BECAUSE I VIOLATE THEIR COMFORT ZONE.

Truth needs no law to support it. Truth is self-evident to all. Truth withstands re-examination. Truth survives questions. Throughout history, from Galileo to Zundel, only lies and liars have resorted to the courts to enforce adherence to dogma.

MICHAEL RIVERO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top