Nope. Concerned you're wasting my time with garbage. (See above.)
Choose. I'll be back.
9/11 was an inside job
- Thread starter WINSTON
- Start date
- Status
Nope. Concerned you're wasting my time with garbage. (See above.)
Choose. I'll be back.
The route north of the CITGO garage misses the light poles. So how were the light poles removed. I presume you know about the light poles.
This from someone who admits he doesn't look at what I post. No wonder you keep asking questions that I've already answered.
Like all you BCTs suffering from Cognitive Dissonance you deal with this by running away from it.
ME? OFFER PROOF? Why do I have the need to do that?
A NEW INQUIRY WILL DO THAT.
DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT?
Not wasting my time old chum. You might not be reading what I type but others are.
Sure. I love 'em. Why don't you show me exactly which ones were knocked over by the aircraft?
First, I do look at your pointless videos, and I've said as much, so that's a lie. Second, you just said that I sanctioned the invasion of Iraq because I don't believe in the 'Troof'. That doesn't follow, and you know it, and you're just digressing the point because your evidence doesn't stand up. Sorry, but that doesn't cut it. It's a lie, and these points have been dealt with already. I'm losing patience with you.
Really? Cause I'm right here. Which part of the Troofer conspiracy did you want me to destroy now? Go on, post it.
Because this is an evidence-based forum, not a soapbox to rage against the machine from.
YES. I HAVE A HUGE PROBLEM WITH WASTING MORE TIME AND MONEY ON THIS CRAP. I THINK IT'S MISLEADING AT BEST, AND DELIBERATELY DISTRACTING AT WORST.
DO YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT?
Certainly do
And so does this man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KvavRkDIQW8
Thomas Kean - the Chairman of the 911 Commission that wasted your money the last time.
How strange. He certainly seems to think ol' Osama did it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kean
I wonder what this 30 sec vid bite really means. I mean, 30 seconds - sort of sounds as though someone were trying to strip away the context.
Oh Boy!
Does the term "Downed Light poles" on this image (that I already posted - TWICE) mean anything to you.
Your reputation is taking some serious hits here.
Oh Boy!
Does the term "Downed Light poles" on this image (that I already posted - TWICE) mean anything to you.
Yes. That's why I asked about it.
Now, where did you get this list of downed light poles from? Source, please.
You would be unable to deliver any such hits. Stick to the topic, please.
The Government.
Sorry, no. I need a citation directing me to exactly where you got this from.
Then the
What you say you need and what you get are two different things.
If you're interested you'll do it. If you're not then.................................................................
You can't handle the Troof
Well consider it from my perspective: the Kean thing failed, the cops supported the actual story and not the conspiracy tale, the shopkeeps essentially the same, the airspeed is completely reasonable - particularly with the aid of an autopilot - the call to Boeing was a red herring, you can't explain why the Zionists or whatever would use a bomb or a missile instead of an airplane to hit the Pentagon and you're apparently not familiar with how airframes fold up like an accordion when they hit something solid. From all this, I find that you're right, in a way: I am not particularly interested in more of this nonsense, and I am strongly predisposed to disbelieve anything you might write about it. I am in that sense profoundly uninterested in looking it up.
So here's what's going to happen: either i) you are going to find an exact and specific link that illustrates in detail which lightpoles went down and exactly where and you are going to post it to this thread, or ii) you will have lost this debate by default. Those are not my rules, they are the rules of decent discussion. You will not that I am not a moderator, and particularly not of the sort that two or three around here are, and cannot and would not ban you for making assertions that you refuse to support - and I make note of the fact that people have certainly been quite seriously threatened with such bans here for exactly this offense at first offering, not at the third or fourth, as here - but rather will simply consider the issue dealt with by me, yet again.
And if I may say, in a general sense, if this is the consistency of the great 'Troofer' movement then it is aptly derogated: a movement (and I had one earlier) not seeking the actual truth, but an unfunny parody of same, as if a stray dog were searching for greater meaning in a hubcap laying on the road. Where did it come from? How did it get here? The obvious conclusion is that one of the big two-legs put it down... but maybe life is more complex than that! And this stray dog then goes on to extrapolate a pantheon of deities and all their inter-relations and social status and desires and goals and hates from this, by colourful inferences that amount to the same as predicting the future by feeling and interpreting the bumps on Walt's a*****e.
Well consider it from my perspective: the Kean thing failed, the cops supported the actual story and not the conspiracy tale, the shopkeeps essentially the same, the airspeed is completely reasonable - particularly with the aid of an autopilot - the call to Boeing was a red herring, you can't explain why the Zionists or whatever would use a bomb or a missile instead of an airplane to hit the Pentagon and you're apparently not familiar with how airframes fold up like an accordion when they hit something solid. From all this, I find that you're right, in a way: I am not particularly interested in more of this nonsense, and I am strongly predisposed to disbelieve anything you might write about it. I am in that sense profoundly uninterested in looking it up.
So here's what's going to happen: either i) you are going to find an exact and specific link that illustrates in detail which lightpoles went down and exactly where and you are going to post it to this thread, or ii) you will have lost this debate by default. Those are not my rules, they are the rules of decent discussion. You will not that I am not a moderator, and particularly not of the sort that two or three around here are, and cannot and would not ban you for making assertions that you refuse to support - and I make note of the fact that people have certainly been quite seriously threatened with such bans here for exactly this offense at first offering, not at the third or fourth, as here - but rather will simply consider the issue dealt with by me, yet again.
And if I may say, in a general sense, if this is the consistency of the great 'Troofer' movement then it is aptly derogated: a movement (and I had one earlier) not seeking the actual truth, but an unfunny parody of same, as if a stray dog were searching for greater meaning in a hubcap laying on the road. Where did it come from? How did it get here? The obvious conclusion is that one of the big two-legs put it down... but maybe life is more complex than that! And this stray dog then goes on to extrapolate a pantheon of deities and all their inter-relations and social status and desires and goals and hates from this, by colourful inferences that amount to the same as predicting the future by feeling and interpreting the bumps on Walt's a*****e.
Oh, dear god. This is your homepage, isn't it?
http://www.cromleck-de-rennes.com/
Well... there we go then.
Look. I like all that shit too. No, I really, really do. I fucking love it. I am positively enamoured of nearly abstract mathematical exploration, particularly as it relates to big issues of religion and history and prophecy (not so much the prophecy) and meaning and life and mystery. I love the shit out of it. Gives me shivers and makes me jumpy.
The problem is that it's all crap. It's not true. There's nothing special about this place, and our position in it. Nothing magical or really eerie or mystical. It's just unfounded interpretations applied to uncommon events. That's all.
http://www.cromleck-de-rennes.com/
Well... there we go then.
Look. I like all that shit too. No, I really, really do. I fucking love it. I am positively enamoured of nearly abstract mathematical exploration, particularly as it relates to big issues of religion and history and prophecy (not so much the prophecy) and meaning and life and mystery. I love the shit out of it. Gives me shivers and makes me jumpy.
The problem is that it's all crap. It's not true. There's nothing special about this place, and our position in it. Nothing magical or really eerie or mystical. It's just unfounded interpretations applied to uncommon events. That's all.
It must mean they fired SIX missiles with super secret hologram generators to knock down all those light poles!
His reputation is just fine.
- Status