WTC Building 7 on 9/11

Shaman what's the point of debating anything when you're always on the defence, you fall back to the "well that's the accepted theory (the usual 9/11 explanation)" so there's no need for you to prove anything.

Don't bother; only one type of people who can go on that type of defense....Those working in the ministry of Disinformation setup by the US government to falsify any truth coming out about 911.
 
Thats it James you're on to me. While it appears that I'm an IT consultant working in Melbourne Australia, I'm actually an employee of the US government. My job is to check forums and discredit those who see through the conspiracy with their extremely accurate youtube videos.

Big thumbs up for u.
:thumbsup:
 
Thats it James you're on to me. While it appears that I'm an IT consultant working in Melbourne Australia, I'm actually an employee of the US government. My job is to check forums and discredit those who see through the conspiracy with their extremely accurate youtube videos.

Big thumbs up for u.
:thumbsup:

Whatever....There is no point talking to u...you're one of them, because every truth or a slight physical evidence that comes out from 911, you straight away deny or falsify it...there seems to be a pattern and it's noticeable in all you posts.
 
sar·casm
Pronunciation:
\ˈsär-ˌka-zəm\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
French or Late Latin; French sarcasme, from Late Latin sarcasmos, from Greek sarkasmos, from sarkazein to tear flesh, bite the lips in rage, sneer, from sark-, sarx flesh; probably akin to Avestan thwarəs- to cut
Date:
1550

1: a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed to cut or give pain2 a: a mode of satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language that is usually directed against an individual b: the use or language of sarcasm
 
Back
Top