In fact this statement:
Was referring (exclusively) to Towers 1 and 2, that 7 may have been on a lean occured to me as an afterthought whilst replying to your (Arthurs) comments about Tower 7 (while commenting on the above post).
I'd have to do some digging to find it, but I've seen at least one guy who's involved in building forensics, or engineering or something along those lines who has stated that there came a point where collapse became inevitable - I don't remember all of the details, but it had to do with the lean of the upper part of the building, or something similar.How did they know, that quickly in advance that the towers were coming down?
Apparently there's some critical angle for most/all buildings that if the lean exceeds that point, collapse becomes a matter of 'when' rather than 'if'.
Anyway, the point is maybe they made judgement calls based on the evidence they had available to them, and came to the conclusion that global collapse was inevitable.
I seem to recall camera crews in helicopters saying the same thing, or something similar anyway.
Was referring (exclusively) to Towers 1 and 2, that 7 may have been on a lean occured to me as an afterthought whilst replying to your (Arthurs) comments about Tower 7 (while commenting on the above post).