World's Politics or USA Politics?

[WillNever]

I just look up your profile, you seem to be quite notorious for being racist.

What are you basing your perceptions on..? I've never even been banned. Why is that, if I'm quite notorious? And notorious among whom..? Our couple of resident angry anti-white arabs..?

 

[kira]

What are you basing your perceptions on..?

Although I wanted to ask mod to close this thread for it's getting really off-topic (gee, thanks for trolling!), it seems that I have to back up my claim first in response to your question above. Give me some time, I'll be back to you.

 

[kira]

Just some examples of your racist statements here and there:

On the topic of IQ and global Inequality, you troll:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2309785&postcount=19

Penis size and global inequality:

Top "smallest" nations:

1) Hong Kong
2) Singapore
3) North Korea
4) South Korea
5) Japan
6) Taiwan

I mean while we're dealing with the subject of asian stereotypes and patterns.

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2356238&postcount=544

These threads are getting boring real fast.

American Indians have one of the highest rates of suicide and personality disorders in the country. Should we blame poor national healthcare for that too..? Nay. The reason that American Indians are afflicted with all sorts of conditions is due to living in a remote, isolated culture, distant from hospitals and whose way of life lacks faith in (and is ignorant of) modern medical science.

Let's talk about REAL issues, not fake ones.

For example, compared to white people, black people have a significantly higher rate of:

Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity
Hypertension
Infant mortality
Stroke
AIDS
Tons of other diseases

Truth be told, blacks (and hispanics) are unhealthier and at risk for more diseases than whites and asians, in almost every single way. This correlation is directly related to their ability to pay for healthcare.

Oopsie, that sort of blew the theory of this thread out of the water.

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2332552&postcount=52

That is because there are people in society who believe that people of certain ethnicities more closely resemble monkeys and pre-human hominids than do other people. Most commonly, people connect them to black people.

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2344159&postcount=46

What are you talking about, you little whacko?

The mentality is linked to their culture. Their culture is linked to their race. That's essentially what black culture is: a counter-culture that developed in response to whites and everything that whites have (in their minds) symbolized. Their skin color is the thread that holds that defiant culture together.

And let's be fair. Rich white guys didn't do this to anybody. The single biggest impediment to black people in America today is not outside discrimination. The single biggest impediment to the advancement of blacks in America is their own racist attitudes, as well as their general refusal to ardently seek higher education as one of their primary goals in life. The tired old list of built-in excuses are a crock. I'm sorry, but it's simply a crock. That's an excuse that held water 50 years ago, perhaps, but it no longer has any merit. Between racial quotas and educational grants and loans that are available to only blacks these days, they actually have a better chance of getting an education than most white kids do. Most blacks simply refuse to go to school and apply themselves. Period. Or, when they do go to school, they generally don't work very hard at it, according to the statistics.

Is it because they're more stupid than whites..? Is that why the grade point averages and test scores nationwide are significantly lower for blacks than they are for ANY other ethnic group in America (look it up)..? Nope, it's because they don't give a crap and they're still waiting for a handout. Or, it's because of the same jailhouse mentality that has been decried by many prominent blacks in this country. Their hatreds, including an inner self-loathing, are eating black culture away from the inside. This isn't something that the "rich white man" can fix for blacks, either. This is something that blacks have always needed to fix for themselves... and thus far, they have refused to acknowledge that these problems even exist for the most part.

I'm watching an entire ethnic group shoot themselves in the foot again -- just as they did back in 1995, when they gleefully celebrated the O.J. Simpson verdict. My tolerance and sympathy for their plight, whether that plight be real, imagined and/or exagerrated, is rapidly dwindling. That's not my fault -- it's theirs and I can guarantee that I'm not the only white American who feels that way.

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2350423&postcount=124

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2348560&postcount=107

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2338531&postcount=43

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2333478&postcount=42

I can't be bothered to find all the links. And let's not forget how you name calling Chinese people with condescending illustration in this thread as well.

Remarks:

rac·ism (rszm)
n.
1. The belief that race accounts for differences in human character or ability and that a particular race is superior to others.
2. Discrimination or prejudice based on race.

Noun 1. racist - a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others​

QED

 

[WillNever]

Did you even read the posts you quoted? Those are statements of outside opinions and in some cases, statements against inequality. It helps to read whole posts.

You still haven't substantiated the claim of my supposed notoriety, either. Do you even know the meaning of the word?

 

[kira]

Did you even read the posts you quoted? Those are statements of outside opinions and in some cases, statements against inequality. It helps to read whole posts.

You still haven't substantiated the claim of my supposed notoriety, either. Do you even know the meaning of the word?

With the way you present yourself in this thread with refers to Chinese and Asians people in general, and some of your racist statements towards blacks and Asians as quoted in the above links, will not take you long to be notorious as racist. I, for one, see you already as racist.

 

[kira]

I herewith report your following posts in this thread to the moderators and administrators of this forum for racist remarks:

Who else is? The greasy little chinese..?

Apart from their greedy and amoral ways? Their skin.

Almost anywhere where where Chinese people inhaibit. They try to blame their greasiness on overactive sebaceous glands. Me, I think it's genetic. Which reminds me, we need another thread on this subject: Asians, and why they look as drones in comparison to whites?

In the meantime, Chinese people are notoriously unhygenic, gross-looking, and uniformly dark eyed and dark eyed. Statistically speaking, on average Asians have very tiny penises. They also torture animals for taste in their food. China is also officially one of the worst human rights abusers on the planet.

Actually it's the flat-chested asians who do that. They know that asian men dream about big breasted Euro-babes, so they get implants. They also dye their hair brown or blonde or red, and their eyes green or blue, colors which are typically non existant in asian populations. They also tan, which looks TERRIBLE on them. Now, when was the last time you saw white people try to emulate asian slant-eyes or boring straight black hair..? Almost never, except for comedic and mockery purposes.

 

[Cowboy]

Are Americans not interested about politics of other part of the world?

Many are, including me. But people tend to care more about issues that directly affect them than those that don't. I'm sure that most people in Norway, for example, are more concerned with what goes on in their own country than what happens in America or Ethiopia. Does this make them self-absorbed, or just realistic?

 

[WillNever]

With the way you present yourself in this thread with refers to Chinese and Asians people in general, and some of your racist statements towards blacks and Asians as quoted in the above links, will not take you long to be notorious as racist. I, for one, see you already as racist.

But you still haven't said who else I am notorious for racism among, except you.

 

[kira]

But you still haven't said who else I am notorious for racism among, except you.

I will tell you once you apologize for making derogatory remarks towards Asian people.

Many are, including me. But people tend to care more about issues that directly affect them than those that don't. I'm sure that most people in Norway, for example, are more concerned with what goes on in their own country than what happens in America or Ethiopia. Does this make them self-absorbed, or just realistic?

You have a point and thank you for staying on topic! There are people who can't resist to participate in a thread without inserting derogatory remarks towards others so that they can feel better about themselves.

What is your opinion about my previous idea, Acid Cowboy:

FEEDBACK

I wanted to start a thread in Site Feedback related to this topic, but this is already in Site Feedback, so I think I can continue in this thread. But I put that red fonts above so that youpeople will notice it

Just an idea, what if the WORLD subforum which consists of World Events, Politics, Business & Economics, and History are rearranged into:

• Global affairs (world events, history, business & economics)
• Americas (USA, Canada, Latin America, and others)
• Middle East
• Asia (China, India, Japan, Indonesia, and others)
• Russia
• Europe
• Africa
• Australia, New Zealand, and other Oceania
• Other

So that local country affairs go to relevant regions and that we have more threads about other part of the world, too? Of course people from any background should be free to post in any regions they are interested in, not necessarily their own region. Maybe the list above isn't the right division of world regions but you can give feedback here in this thread.

To encourage more diverse topics, I suggest that 1 or 2 moderators are appointed for each subforums (depending on the load of the subforums); and that the moderators should come from the relevant regions, so that at least there will be someone who can started topics about each regions and know about that regions, too. For example (just an example!), the moderators can be:

* Global affairs (world events, history, business & economics): Hypewaders, Superstring, Madanthonywayne, Billy T
* Americas (USA, Canada, Latin America, and others): Hypewaders, Superstring, Madanthonywayne, Billy T
* Middle East: somebody who is familiar with this region affairs
* Asia (China, India, Japan, Indonesia, and others): S.A.M.
* Russia: draqon
* Europe: Dywyddyr
* Africa: somebody who is familiar with this region affairs
* Australia, New Zealand, and other Oceania: Asguard
* Other

Are those too much work or what?

 

[draqon]

I herewith report your following posts in this thread to the moderators and administrators of this forum for racist remarks:

Kira...how is me saying that USA is not the only superpower a racist remark? :bugeye: come on Kira were on the same side, here.

 

[kira]

Kira...how is me saying that USA is not the only superpower a racist remark? :bugeye: come on Kira were on the same side, here.

I did not report you, I only quote your and SAM's posts to make the post that I reported not losing the context. Precisely, I press the report button for this post:


http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2391360&postcount=64

and then I added in the report form, that in this post:

http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2392416&postcount=106

they can find the summary of all other Willnever's posts which I found offending, and I wrote that those posts can be found in this thread.

I'm sorry for the confusion!

 

[draqon]

Ok thanks Kira, no problems =)

 

[WillNever]

I herewith report your following posts in this thread to the moderators and administrators of this forum for racist remarks:

Kira, everything I've stated with the exception of my personal view of asian features, is absolutely and positively 100% backable by factual evidence.

Asians having tiny penises, asians going to get double eyelid surgery and making other attempts at emulating white features, asian women having flatter chests than Euro-babes, the Chinese in particular torturing dogs and cats for taste in their food, and the Chinese being officially one of the worst human rights abusers on the planet. All of that is 100% objective and incontrovertible reality, and those things are not up for debate. No amount of politically correct soothsaying can change those things either. The only thing that can change is the sense of acceptance that Asians have toward those truths. They have a choice to either deny them or to come to terms with them, and improve from there. There is only one correct choice, however.

 

[WillNever]

FEEDBACK

I wanted to start a thread in Site Feedback related to this topic, but this is already in Site Feedback, so I think I can continue in this thread. But I put that red fonts above so that youpeople will notice it

Just an idea, what if the WORLD subforum which consists of World Events, Politics, Business & Economics, and History are rearranged into:

• Global affairs (world events, history, business & economics)
• Americas (USA, Canada, Latin America, and others)
• Middle East
• Asia (China, India, Japan, Indonesia, and others)
• Russia
• Europe
• Africa
• Australia, New Zealand, and other Oceania
• Other

So that local country affairs go to relevant regions and that we have more threads about other part of the world, too? Of course people from any background should be free to post in any regions they are interested in, not necessarily their own region. Maybe the list above isn't the right division of world regions but you can give feedback here in this thread.

Back on topic: bad idea. Too many forums. Those Russia, Oceania, and African forums would never be used. It's fine the way it is and if anything, the USA deserves its own forum rather being in a North American category, due to its severe differences from Latin America as well as its superior influence and importance in the world, as compared to all other countries. Not being centric, just stating truth.

 

[Dywyddyr]

as well as its superior influence and importance in the world, as compared to all other countries. Not being centric, just stating truth.

USA-centric bull.

 

[WillNever]

I'm prepared to hear your reasoning. But spare me if it's more of the same "every country is equally important and influential in the world" crappola though, please.

 

[Dywyddyr]

I'm prepared to hear your reasoning.

How gracious of you.
But shouldn't you give your reasoning, bearing in mind your original contention?
I supposed to give my reasoning against a flat statement of yours?
Do me a favour...

 

[WillNever]

All-around, the USA is the biggest exporter in the world, of almost everything. Not just goods, but ideas too. Technology. Culture. Fashions. Music. Even violence. We're also the most powerful country in the world, both on the international stage and on the economic stage.

For better or worse, the USA is currently the most influential and most important country in the world. That may change one day, but right now that is the way it is. I can't imagine anyone arguing against that.

 

[Dywyddyr]

All-around, the USA is the biggest exporter in the world

Yup, biggest in the world.
After the EU, Germany and China. But who's counting?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_exports

Not just goods, but ideas too. Technology. Culture. Fashions. Music. Even violence.

Any actual figures to back that up, or are you going to stick opinion?
Just so I know...

For better or worse, the USA is currently the most influential and most important country in the world.

So it's still your opinion/ flat statement then?

I can't imagine anyone arguing against that.

Well obviously you can't, since you seem to think that your word is good enough.

 

[WillNever]

Yup, biggest in the world.
After the EU, Germany and China. But who's counting?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_exports

Dwydder, the "EU" isn't a country, and what part of biggest exporter of goods AND ideas didn't you understand..? And certainly we are, that. I've actually been to Germany, where practically everyone under a certain age speaks English. They also dress just like we do, in distinctively American style clothing. Culturally, the USA sets the tone for Europe these days, instead of the other way around.

As for China, their exports are a direct result of our demand for them. We export our business to them as well. They take our ideas, we take their manufactured goods.