And where is a computer simulation of the collapse.
World trade centre collapse, 9/11 conspiracy
- Thread starter someguy1
- Start date
- Status
And where is a computer simulation of the collapse.
Stop being so ignorantly obtuse.
The facts are incredibly evident. 20 or so scum bag religious terrorists, worked and learnt how to fly undercover in the US. They hijacked four jet planes. They flew two into the WTC towers, one into the Pentagon, and the other crashed after some brave passengers tried to wrestle back control. 3000 odd people were killed in the process. If you differ noticably from those facts, you are dabbling into unsupported conspiracy nonsense.
Nice Michael, but even reputable and convincing evidence and arguments as put by those experts, will never convince any fanatical conspiracy nut.
I know I know but as long as people keep sprouting evolution evolution how can I get them to accept The Earth is flat?
wink wink
You 911 religionists just believe, you don't check shit. That is the trouble with computer simulations
alone. Computers will compute whatever assumptions no matter how stupid.
http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
That is from Frank Greening's report. He admits that he takes the entire mass of the tower and divides it by 110. The towers were actually 116 stories tall because there were 6 basement levels. You don't construct buildings that big on dirt. They dug down to bedrock and built up from there. But by simply dividing by 110 he is assuming every level had the same weight.
WRONG!
All you have to do is look at Lon Water's core column cross sections to see that they got thinner toward the top. The engineer I referred you to stated that skyscrapers had to be bottom heavy. I have known Greening was talking BS for more than a decade.
But believers cannot think for themselves. Whatever says what they want to hear must be right no matter how obvious the flaws.
Not worshipping at the 9/11 religion is HERESY!
LOL
Last edited:
You seem excited?
Look, you and the rest of your ilk can cuddle up to your crazy conspiracy nonsense as much and as long as you like, it doesn't change facts. All it does is catagorise those conspiracy versions as nonsense, unevidenced, and the cry of ratbags needing some mystery and excitement in their lives. The standard evidenced back answers and facts are just to boring for such people. Tell me old Son, are you into any other conspiracies?
So do your own.
Strange you are such a coward that you are afraid to do your own work. I think you realize that it will prove that what happened is - exactly what DID happen, which is that the towers failed because they were hit by fully fueled 767's that started catastrophic fires.
I imagine that such a realization would completely destroy your psyche. You've spent years telling yourself you are brilliant, and that the "believers" "religionists" "sheeple" are ignorant people. Your sense of self is deeply tied to that sense of arrogant superiority. I think the realization that you were duped would shatter you.
exchemist
Valued Senior Member
This made me burst out laughing. Nice one!
I actually believe, as evident by his latest apparent desperate, angry outbursts, that he does know he has been duped, and all this is simply a cover up, and denial in the face of being duped in reality....a hard medicine to swallow for conspiracy nuts...take MR, or river for example.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
You laugh, but that has been my prediction exactly.
You know how young'uns these days say "...well, if the Moon Landings even happened at all..."? (They do say that.)
I previously predicted that, very soon, young-uns born after 2001 (they'll be 19, now) will be skeptical that the Twin Towers existed at all. That the whole thing was a hoax, and that they've been Photoshopped into history (well ... their internet-y perception of history).
Mark my words.
So you're saying all skyscrapers have to be built like pyramids? Excellent, more indisputable proof the WTC never existed!
I was not expecting such an easy lob. Done the Greening thing before and other people have to.
Last edited:
What job? But hey, I'll recheck the professional expert opinions again tomorrow and see if they have changed.
Or perhaps this is just the usual conspiracy "quality"of delusion/s?
What job? But hey, I'll recheck the professional expert opinions again tomorrow and see if they have changed.
Or perhaps this is just the usual conspiracy "quality"of delusion/s?
"Lob" with an L not job with J.
Reading is fundamental.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lob_(tennis)
My mistake, but in hindsight perhaps you need to stick with tennis and hope you do a better job then wasting time re-enforcing conspiracy nonsense.
What job? But hey, I'll recheck the professional expert opinions again tomorrow and see if they have changed.
Or perhaps this is just the usual conspiracy "quality"of delusion/s?
"Lob" with an L not job with J.
Reading is fundamental.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lob_(tennis)
I do not give a damn about any conspiracy, not even the official one. Conspiracies are about who not what. All I am talking about the physics. Of course if airliner impacts and fire could not produce the observed effects then the official conspiracy theory has a problem.
Of course the 9/11 religionists might have a problem with holes in that theory. LOL
Why are you wasting time reading and responding?
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
"Official" Conspiracy?
- Status