It's hardly surprising that male chauvinism was projected onto God and subsequently written into scripture. After all, it was typically men who were behind such things. Does anyone really think that God would still be a "father" if women were the physically stronger sex?
It's funny too, because "birthing" a universe and tending to it seems like a motherly thing to do.
women are not equal to men..(back to this is a bit..)
and i thank God everytime i see a pregnant woman, that i am a guy..i would not be able to go through what they go through during pregnancy..
Gen 1
26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”
other versions say 'take charge','have dominion' one even says 'be responsible'..
all of which is redundant cause they seem to do a fair job of taking care of themselves..
2:18 The Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him.”
all the versions i looked at said 'helper'
it only implies subordinate in the context of getting paid to help..
(and notice the term 'suitable for him' doesn't imply humanity as whole but more of an individual?)
back to my original statement..
Women are not equal to men.
and men are not superior to women.
they have a different skill set to bring to the table..
its not fair to compare women to men, it as apple to oranges..
each have their own unique skill set that when we get together we are complete..we were not meant to do this world all by ourselves,we need a helper..
and who assumes the role of helper in your relationships is between you and your other.
i would be perfectly happy to assume the role of domestic duties..i like to cook..love the grand kid..
(but if your with your other long enough, you can take turns being the helper..)
anyway..where were we?