(Insert title here)
Ah,
Lepus, you're overlooking one important thing.
Real and
genuine information sources generally have better things to do. So when you want a glimpse into the vapid, you go to the vapid. How is it that you do not understand this? If I want Disney, why would I go to a Mondrian exhibition? If I want heavy metal, why would I listen to Glass' string quartets? If I want information about complete idiocy and moronic self-addiction, why would I bother looking in the
New York Times,
Washington Post, or
Encyclopædia Britannica?
Lepustimidus said:
So you're not going to address what I quoted furry culture wiki? Why not? Because you don't consider the source to be reliable?
There's not much to address. As I noted before, it is what it is. In the meantime, you have yet to follow through on your analysis of the E/D.
Which part of the citation do you object to? The accusations of racism against the game's moderators? The fact of protesters? The idea of a spam email parody of an Alice Cooper song?
The rest of your post is just the usual bullshit, true to your persona. Again, I demand you provide an independent source to validate Dramatica, or retract it.
Is it too much to ask that you ever have a substantive argument about, oh, say, the issue at hand?
Let's see, here. Racism at Habbo? Well, we could always check
Habbo.com, but I can easily imagine you complaining about the reliability of discussion group postings. "Civil rights" raids? Well, we all know that
Wikipedia is often unreliable. The Alice Cooper parody? Well, that's the problem with email copypasta, isn't it?
One of the problems the issue faces is that it's an incredibly petty and ridiculous "meme". Not many "reliable" sources are going to waste their time on it. So when we need to take the pulse of the uncommonly stupid, why not turn to the uncommonly stupid?
If, on the other hand, you are such a literalist as your complaint depicts you, I can understand how reading between lines and comprehending the nature of stories are such challenges to you. Of course, that only reminds that your opinion, while valid inasmuch as it is
yours, hasn't much to do with anything substantial.