Leo Volont
Registered Senior Member
Paul's easy way to Salvation"!? Salvation had never been an issue.
Before Paul nobody had ever considered it a very Great Religious Priority to find a way for people to sin all they liked.
Remember that Paul's Religious Doctrine DESTROYED a Civilization. You cannot tell people that they can sin all they like without expecting adverse consequences.
Catholic Civilization succeeded largely because EVERYBODY was illiterate and the letters of Paul could simply be left undiscussed.
Look at the Moral Imperitives of all of the Major Religious Orders that BUILT Christian Civilization out of the chaos of the Dark Ages. They were not Paulists. They asserted RIGHTEOUSNESS.
The Catholics Today are not the same Catholics that gave us the "Thousand Year Reign of Christ on Earth". You see, after the Protestants had won their battle, after thirty years of rape and unlimitied pillage and murder, the Catholic Bishops gave in. They held the Council of Trent and adopted Protestant Theology.
But while the Catholic Bishops, those child molesters, are effective Protestants, thos Catholics of the Marian Religious Orders are not. Well... to be intellectually honest, one of the accords of the Council of Trent was that EVERY ordained Priest would have to go through 7 years of Paulist Protestant Indoctrination. So it is that most candidates to the Priesthood, no matter how pure when they start out, can't stand up to the Antichristical indoctrination and come back spouting how Saved Christians can sin all they want as long as they have Faith... just like Protestants, but unlike any Priest who had served during the 1000 Year Reign of Catholic Civilization.
Its heartbreaking to see a Franciscan Friar telling a room full of Catholic Bible Studiers that they can sin all they want. One can ask that Ordained Idiot to point out any instance where Francis, his Patron Saint, had ever told anybody they could drink, gamble and copulate (exploit the poor and murder their competition) as much as they liked, and he would look in amazement and wouldn't understand the point at all. He forgets that the Original Franciscans were not required to undergo the same indoctrination as himself.
Look at the Catholic Religious Orders and examine their specific beliefs. How very few of them are Paulists.
Remember that Martin Luther's Battle Cry during the bloody Protestant Rebellion, where it was urged that Priests and monk be killed and nuns be raped, was that the Catholic Establishment had ELIMINATED PAULIST DOCTRINE from any studied curriculum. So we KNOW that Catholics BEFORE the Reformation WERE NOT PAULISTS. Now, at least the Child Molesting Bishops ARE Paulists. The Seminaries TEACH Paulism.
But that is NOT Catholicism. That is Catholicism under duress. Those Fat Cat Bishops were threatened with revocation of their Country Club Memberships and so they decided that God WANTS PEOPLE TO SIN.
yeah, right.
Although I am a fine Catholic, I can certainly assert with the utmost confidenct that there is perhaps no lower moral being in earth or in hell than a Catholic Bishop, or a priest who has accepted a degree in the teaching of Free Sin.
Before Paul nobody had ever considered it a very Great Religious Priority to find a way for people to sin all they liked.
Remember that Paul's Religious Doctrine DESTROYED a Civilization. You cannot tell people that they can sin all they like without expecting adverse consequences.
Catholic Civilization succeeded largely because EVERYBODY was illiterate and the letters of Paul could simply be left undiscussed.
Look at the Moral Imperitives of all of the Major Religious Orders that BUILT Christian Civilization out of the chaos of the Dark Ages. They were not Paulists. They asserted RIGHTEOUSNESS.
The Catholics Today are not the same Catholics that gave us the "Thousand Year Reign of Christ on Earth". You see, after the Protestants had won their battle, after thirty years of rape and unlimitied pillage and murder, the Catholic Bishops gave in. They held the Council of Trent and adopted Protestant Theology.
But while the Catholic Bishops, those child molesters, are effective Protestants, thos Catholics of the Marian Religious Orders are not. Well... to be intellectually honest, one of the accords of the Council of Trent was that EVERY ordained Priest would have to go through 7 years of Paulist Protestant Indoctrination. So it is that most candidates to the Priesthood, no matter how pure when they start out, can't stand up to the Antichristical indoctrination and come back spouting how Saved Christians can sin all they want as long as they have Faith... just like Protestants, but unlike any Priest who had served during the 1000 Year Reign of Catholic Civilization.
Its heartbreaking to see a Franciscan Friar telling a room full of Catholic Bible Studiers that they can sin all they want. One can ask that Ordained Idiot to point out any instance where Francis, his Patron Saint, had ever told anybody they could drink, gamble and copulate (exploit the poor and murder their competition) as much as they liked, and he would look in amazement and wouldn't understand the point at all. He forgets that the Original Franciscans were not required to undergo the same indoctrination as himself.
Look at the Catholic Religious Orders and examine their specific beliefs. How very few of them are Paulists.
Remember that Martin Luther's Battle Cry during the bloody Protestant Rebellion, where it was urged that Priests and monk be killed and nuns be raped, was that the Catholic Establishment had ELIMINATED PAULIST DOCTRINE from any studied curriculum. So we KNOW that Catholics BEFORE the Reformation WERE NOT PAULISTS. Now, at least the Child Molesting Bishops ARE Paulists. The Seminaries TEACH Paulism.
But that is NOT Catholicism. That is Catholicism under duress. Those Fat Cat Bishops were threatened with revocation of their Country Club Memberships and so they decided that God WANTS PEOPLE TO SIN.
yeah, right.
Although I am a fine Catholic, I can certainly assert with the utmost confidenct that there is perhaps no lower moral being in earth or in hell than a Catholic Bishop, or a priest who has accepted a degree in the teaching of Free Sin.
Paul provided the easy way to salvation.Expecting Jesus to bear our sins and do the dirty work for us. I also do not believe that was the original intent of Christs' message. I cannot find any logic at all in believing God would incarnate he/she self into human form to act as a sacrifice back to himself so that he/she can tolerate our non perfect selves in the afterlife..wtf??
