no, but your reasoning held no evidence that f911 was a extremist liberal movie. Perhaps a "I hate bush so much" movie, but where was the talk of extreme liberal ideals?
Why isn't bush recieving an impeachment?
- Thread starter reap
- Start date
It may be a rally point for everyone that hates Bush,but its not a rally point for exterme liberal ideals.
The 'Downing Street Memo' will probably be Bush's legacy. Impeachment could eventually happen as a result of this important memo being scrutinized by important members of both parties, congress and now the american press. With enough support by the american people, the 'Downing Street Memo' could be the 'The Straw That Breaks The Camel's Back'. (impeach-bush-now.org)
Novacane
Novacane
There are people working towards an inquiry about the question of impeachment, but until the democrats take back the house, it won't happen. There is a possibility in 2006 to vote in more democrats, and then it might.
Bush lied about everything involving the Iraq war but the majority of the American people will never know about Bush's lies and they will never know about the Downing Street memo. The problem lies with the American media having no interest in keeping the American people informed and lies with the American people not wanting to hear anything that would make them change their minds about any of their past beliefs.
Give them the Michael Jackson distraction and they will be happy.
Give them the Michael Jackson distraction and they will be happy.
There is a 'second' Downing Street memo that has just been released that adds validity to the first memo. This one is about 'Wrongfooting Sadam': http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0506/S00116.htm Check it out.
Novacane
Novacane
Careful, it could be a Karl Rove trick, leaking a fake second memo and then debunking it, thereby attempting to discredit the first one.
reap said:
I hate politics because of the corruption and bad decisions. What constitutes an impeachable offense? Our dislike?
How can anyone believe anything the media says anymore now that ABC lied and Newsweek was responsible for deaths?
Did you ask the president, was he made aware through the chain of command that there would be an attack? Oh, someone made a mistake alright, but I doubt it was the President. Another reason to impeach him is because of congresses hypocrasy? Isn't congress voted by the people?
If you are against the war in Iraq, then you need to apologize to Hitler. We have always looked out for the meek.
If the President lied about WoMD, then I am upset and he needs to answer for that. I am more upset at Clinton for coming on my television screen and lying to my face! Did bush lie? Is there a provable answer? If he is innocent until proven guilty, should we not believe our commander-in-chief?
Looks like a witch hunt to me.
If you all want to impeach him and think someone else can do a better job, then do it. If you can't, then don't cry about it and stand by your President who represents your country until you can kick his butt out. I respect him for not caving to the beaurocracy of a crooked government.
Lying about matters of war.
The media is largely silent, but what we are talking about is an authentic memo, delivered to Tony Blair. No one has ever come forward and said it wasn't true.
ABC didn't lie, I assume you are talking about Dan Rather. The story about Bush avoiding National Guard service was true.
The Newsweek story is also true about detainee abuses, our own government's reports have confirmed it.
What are you talking about? We didn't look out for the meek when we sold Saddam the chemical weapons he used to gas the Kurds, along with the helicopters. Then there's the Nicaraguan death squads that Reagan supported...
Really? More upset that Clinton got a BJ than innocent Iraqis and our soldiers died? That's pretty strange.
I think so.
Yes.
No. Although he is innocent until proven guilty, I feel he is a lier and cannot be trusted.
I can't do it personally, but I could vote for someone who could.
I stand by my country, that's why I can't stand Bush.
Dude, he is the crooked government.
crazy151drinker
Registered Senior Member
So I guess according to your Logic Spider the almighty Lord Kennedy should have been impeached for starting the Vietnam war and getting all those innocent Vietnamese killed. Like wise Clinton should have been impeached for allowing all those innocent Rwandians to be killed. You could apply your logic to every single U.S. President.
Bush is not liable for impeachment for killing the innocent, that's an unfortunate part of war. The thing he did wrong was decieving congress and the world about the justification for the Iraqi war.
reap said:
The Bin Laden's having nothing to do with Osama Bin Laden. It's an entirely different family. Having an oil business is not against the law. I did not know every senator had to send their son to war, if they voted for it.. This sounds like Michael Moore nonsense. Stay away from the fringe, cook conspiracy bullshit. It only hurts you, more than anyone else.
9-11 was a failure for our security in that we did not stop it. I'm not sure who to "blame" for it (other than the hijackers who ACTUALLY did it) However, in you're anti-Bush mindset obviously I know who you blame. It's Bush!!!!!
Rush Limbaugh has been saying that Democrats would be clamoring to impeach Bush and I thought he was full of it.
Man, you Democrats/liberals have got to calm down and think critically. If Clinton had these same "failures" you would not care - because his liberal social policies suit you. Just stick to his policies and legitimate things you don't like about him, but this crap is just a waste of time.
This has nothing to with Bush recieving an impeachment, but everything to do with a person who wants to grind a paranoid, conspiratorial axe to get rid of someone they don't like.
:m:
spidergoat said:
He is using information from our intelligence that says Iran has nukes right now. Do you think He is lying about that information? I don't understand this thinking. President Bush got his "justification" from the intelligence we had at the time and with a sort of blind nodding of the head and saying, the buck stops with the President in some desperate (but feable) attempt to blame BUSH FOR SOMETHING. Let it go, and promote you're own ideas and agenda's.
Just simply say, I think President Bush is too stuborn and incorrect on the issues for our country! Because I for one do.
crazy151drinker said:
I think Bush, Clinton and Saddam should all be hung together in a public hanging. A half million children died in the crossfire of the cold war between Clinton and Saddam. Read Michael Parenti on Yugoslavia; Clinton also believed in a neoconservative foreign policy and continued Bush senior's policies of cautious ruthlessness. The difference between the Bush junior Administration and the Clinton and Bush senior Administrations is that Bush junior is reckless, fearless and foolish and feels that he has the media in his pocket while Bush senior and Clinton were afraid of provoking a backlash.
What kind of man is Clinton if he let the bad experience in Somalia stop him from doing right by Rawanda? Stopping the Rawanda genocide would not have cost much.
If Bush Junior cares so much about human life that he had to rescue Iraqis from Saddam the why isn't he intervening in Sudan. If Bush wants to spread democracy then why did he use US tax dollars to topple a democracy in Haiti? Cross concern about WMD, desire to spread democracy, and care about human lives of your list of possible reasons for why Bush invaded Iraq.
Why did none of Bush Senior, Bush Junior, or Clinton intervene in Congo?
Hang all the high level Neocons, Bathists, Nazis and Stalinists; the are all the same proptotype of people and they will all be war criminals if given the chance to be war criminals. They are all overgrown geeky boys living out their macho thug power fantasies in a very hands off nerdish way. At least the idiot Taliban, Jihadis, Christian Fundamentalists, and Moaist war criminals sincerely believe in what their doing. The crazed idealists hands are cleaner than those of the geeky thugs are.