Balder1: On a campaign?
The discrimination against homosexuals is highly exaggerated, and not a big enough problem to make Christianity the primary or secondary problem of the United States.
Yes, yes, yes. I'm sure you were there, weren't you, when 49% of the vote wished to strip homosexuals of their civil rights and rewrite the state curriculum from kindergarten through medical school to include a constant and proactive denunciation of homosexuality. We all held our breath for a moment.
You don't have any examples of this,
Oh, for fuck's sake.
You know, I've got people bitching at me about the length of my posts, about my citations, about the amount of evidence they're expected to consider.
Column A? Column B?
Remember the "Cape Fear" episode of
The Simpsons, when Bart kept running from end to end on the boat, looking for a way out?
-
Top 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books, 1990 - 2000 (#2
Daddy's Roommate, and #11
Heather Has Two Mommies are both about homosexuality.
Heather, in fact, is the impetus for the Oregon Citizens' Alliance anti-gay crusade. It started at the Springfield, Oregon public library. Ten freaking years,
Balder1. Ten freaking years.)
Also on that list: #1, #7, #9, #16, #18, #22, #27, #28, #34, #36 ... Jeez, I can't keep up with how many of these are challenged by religious folk. In the year 2000,
Harry Potter topped the challenged list. The
American Library Association notes:
The ALA Office for Intellectual Freedom received a total of 646 challenges in 2000, up from 472 in 1999. A challenge is defined as a formal, written complaint filed with a library or school about a book?s content or appropriateness. Schools, school libraries, and public libraries report the majority of challenges.
Let's see ... four of the top ten in 2000 were noted for occult themes, among other issues. And Maya Angelou? Perhaps you missed the 1980s and a crusade against popular music. Of course, there was also the
Marilyn Manson debacle six years ago.
If you don't see it that often, you might not be looking for it. I've
never seen a real buried treasure. But then, I've never gone and looked for one.
The Christians I know don't discriminate. What churches have you been going to?
I'll take your word for it. I was raised Lutheran, went to Catholic school, am on modestly good terms with Quakers, severely dislike the Southern Baptist Convention, Seventh-Day Adventism, the Missouri Synod, and pretty much any other Christian church I've happened to be in whose denomination I did not catch. I've generally avoided houses of Christian worship for the last ten or so years, preferring to set foot inside only for family funerals.
Btw, this double standard that you hold for religious groups bothers me. It seems like you only target Christianity, one of the most passive and peaceful religions, and don't even mention the two billion Muslims with much more bizarre and destructive beliefs.
Oh, quit your whining, you pathetic bigot. Christianity is much more directly a threat to me than Islam. Islam is only bizarre and scary if you choose to make it seem that way. What, there's violent Muslims? There's hideous Christians, too. I trust people as people and distrust them according to their labels.
Besides, I know Christianity inside and out; I was raised by white Sunday Christians in the United States of America and spent so much time in the paradox of apathy and faith that I've found I understand the religion better than most of the faithful.
If the Muslims were the majority, believe me, you would notice it.
Yeah, I'd hear a lot more quarter-tones.
True, teaching abstinence doesn't work very well, but at least it doesn't hurt.
Reminding people that abstinence is an option is worthwhile. But we all know it's unrealistic. Insisting on abstinence as the sole mode of curriculum, however, is a lunacy unique in the US to Christians.
Teaching kids kama sutra seems like it would hurt.
Well, that would be ridiculous.
What do you want to do, hand out condoms in class and show pornography?
Condoms should be available in ... well, I say high school, but I'm willing to accept junior high, as well. It is the responsibility of the parents to provide their children with the appropriate pornography.
Hire strippers for class?
Art class? Or sex ed?
Come on, let the parents have at least a little say in this.
They do. Like my father did. He simply refused to ever address the issue. I learned at school, from the World Book, looking up "reproduction", in ... sixth grade or seventh. I knew kids in high school who believed you could get pregnant from kissing. Come on ... can we please charge the parents with abuse, or at least dereliction in such cases?
Its better than most of the other religions than I can mention.
Only if you really believe it.
The fact that many of these things directly contradict the Bible just strengthen my point: these actions are a part of human nature.
As I understand it, that's no excuse in God's eyes. Of course, what with the forgiveness myth and all ....
Do you know what the women were carted through the streets for? Disagreeing with their preacher. What is it about Christians that for all the alleged advantages of faith, they're happy to merely be "as good" as the infidels?
Hell, look at the Romans before Christianity, then after.
Um ... wasn't Rome
sacked in there, sometime?
Look at the modern Islamic countries.
Yeah, it's kind of a shame. From the grandest empire in the world to being left out in the cold due to longstanding, religious-based bigotries.
Maybe Christianity just tempered the customary fierceness of the Europeans.
The Europeans, perhaps, but it reinvested itself in the Americans.
These verses are God's word. , not to taken lightly. Many of those atrocities that you attribute to Christianity are just plain old corruption, not inspired by the Bible at all.
It's a nice excuse that fits nicely with a tiny sampling such as you have provided. I'm sure you're aware of the Amalakites in the Old Testament, and how God punished Saul, first King of Israel, for failing to complete a genocide. Or when an angel of the Lord praised Lot for offering his daughters up for gang rape. Or 1 Corinthians which prohibits women speaking in church, and demands that they must be in submission (by the way, do you know what
Islam means?) There's 1 Timothy, which dictates dress and quietness and submission again. We pick on Muslims for the burka, but there's always 1 Corinthians 11.5:
but any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled dishonors her head -- it is the same as if her head were shaven.
I fully admit that Islam makes me at least as nervous as Christianity, especially American Christianity. And the reason is that Muslims in general take God more seriously than American Christians, and are more devoted to their faith.
There's all manner of evil sh
t in the Bible, and for ages the faithful have been tailoring their faith to their existing prejudices. You call it human nature. Well, analogously, I'd say it was fire, but some people would call it a 757 crashing into the World Trade Center. You can call it human nature, but I see a massive and frightening exaggeration of some of the worst aspects thereof in the Christian manifestation.
I'd like an example of injustice inspired by Christianity, since that's what we are debating.
How about genocide?
The Pastor who joined the genocide (BBC). It's a pretty ugly story.
God Hates Fags, a website devoted to the triumph of Christ over the wicked homosexuals, run by
Fred Phelps, former Democratic fundraiser and delegate:
"We understand that Iraq is the only Muslim state that allows the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ to be freely and openly preached on the streets without fear of arrest and prosecution. Alas, the United States no longer allows the Gospel to be freely and openly preached on the streets, because militant sodomites now control our government, and they violently object to the Bible message...The same majoritarian sodomite tyranny that now guides the Clinton administration's repressive policies toward Gospel preaching on America's streets, is apparently responsible -- at least in part -- for the merciless slaughter by starvation of 400 innocent Iraqi babies each day in your country. If our government and laws will allow it, and at the invitation of your government, we would like to send a delegation from Westboro Baptist Church in Topeka, Kansas, to preach the Gospel on the streets of Baghdad for one week in the near future."
-- Fred Phelps, in a letter to Saddam Hussein,
November 30, 1997
-
Note: The above excerpt comes from the Anti-Defamation League.
Now that's some pretty wicked Christianity right there.
And about half of them go to Church once a year or less, I'd bet. Americans are not devout Christians, let me tell you, but most of them aren't quite ready to admit they are atheists yet. I won't even call myself an atheist yet. These people are not religious extremists.
They don't have to be extremists. It's just that every day of their lives they think in terms of what happens after they die.
What's so damaging about it?
If I need to explain to you what is damaging about cultural paradigm-level sanctified greed, then perhaps you shouldn't be undertaking this conversation right now.
This annoying moral crap doesn't make any sense.
Of course not; it's fundamental. As such, it's not supposed to make sense to you right away.
What is your religion, Tiassa?
I have no official religion.
Don't condemn greed. Greed=Ambition=Accomplishment.
From Saint Augustine to Machiavelli to Adam Smith to Henry Ford to Bill Gates, and a heavenly host of philosophers lost along the way. Kant, Hegel, Hume, Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke ... all of it and that equation has not been written in its proper form yet. Greed represents excess of necessity.
Something you wouldn't know about, I suppose.
Actually, I know greed very well. I was raised to be greedy. It's a daily struggle to purge myself. Of course, my father was an idiot in that sense; he actually thought he could insist on integrity while teaching greed. Whether it was parental affection, being the younger brother, or the fact that integrity demonstrably proved itself to be the most economic theoretical course, I chose integrity over greed.
And blankc, Tiassa uses greed in the sense that to reach for anything extravagant is a form of greed. So if you're trying to cure cancer, you're just being greedy.
You'll have to explain that one. What is extravagant about curing cancer?
Think on this one,
Balder1: I grew up in a family that owned two houses, five cars, anywhere between three and six boats at any given time, and lived simultaneously in two states, and I was expected to believe that we were poor. Give me a
fcking break.
Apparently Tiassa does his altruistic deeds so he can get a sense of morality and righteousness. He wants to be noble.
Again, one of those fundamental inadequacies that you just can't help,
Balder1. It comes with the paradigm. If you were smarter, you would know to never apply your own perspective to whomever it is you've decided is your enemy for the day.
The only problem with being noble is that it involves a comparison that I reject as a motivation.
Try arguing ideas in the future,
Balder1. Don't argue just to argue against me. By the way, that Protestant "loving-god" theory has a wonderful little name attached to it: "Market-Share Theology". I gotta admit, the deathbed confession is a great out for those sinners who couldn't get it right the first time, or the second when they were born again, or the third when they were born
again, or the fourth when they converted to some communal post-Hindu tax shelter, or the
fifth time when they were saved in a bitter condemnation of other religions while never bothering to stop and look at what was sick about their own damned hearts.
Argue
ideas,
Balder1, and not against me. You'll be able to see even your own issues much more clearly.
:m:,
Tiassa