Trek
Registered Senior Member
If you believed in both, how can they be no difference?Both.
In my case no difference.
If you believed in both, how can they be no difference?Both.
In my case no difference.
Job lot as I said before. Are you going to acknowledge the other part of my reply?If you believed in both, how can they be no difference?
Sorry I didn’t catch it.Job lot as I said before.
I already gave a summary earlier in this thread showing how they are basically the same, just with different names.Are you going to acknowledge the other part of my reply?
Multiple creation myths documented by ancient cultures?
Perhaps I should have dismantled this at the time.@Pinball..
“God” is a loose term which of late can be described as the creator of the universe. This description does align with the Christian/Jewish, Islamic, and Hindu scriptures. So to say there are a gazilion Gods makes no sense.
The creation of the universe according to Greek mythology was born out of Chaos. Some anthropomorphise Chaos, some don’t.’
The Roman version of creation is pretty similar to the Greeks, but no distinct monotheistic creator.
The Egyptian god of creation is very close with the monotheistic Hindu god Vishnu, but is known as Atum Ra
The Babylonian creation myth is basically the same as the Greek myth. Born out of Chaos,
If we look carefully these are basically the same characters with different names.
The idea of there being thousands of gods is not related to the term God which is a monotheistic concept. For example the Hindus, despite being polytheistic recognise Vishnu (some Shiva) as the one Supreme Being that is not only responsible for the creation of the universe out of chaotic unmanifested matter, but the creator of innumerable gods (Demi-gods/Devasevi).
Just so we don’t get confused we should refer to the creator of the universe(s) as God, and refer to gods as the superintendents of the universe(s).
In this way there is only one God, but thousand, millions, or whatever gods.”
Lol!Perhaps I should have dismantled this at the time.
They’re the same stories understood by vast amounts of different peoples, religions, eras, empires, cultures, traditions, characteristics, time, events, circumstances, etc. Every human being is a unique individual.Why would a creator give different stories, different characters, hero's and villains, himself different names sex and characteristics, and different rules and fates for his people?
No. IMO the chaos is inevitable.Would that not lead to a chaotic world?
They are completely different stories.They’re the same stories
The fact they all accept the universe was created (came into being) is one obvious uniformity.They are completely different stories.
Yeah and people, animals, mountains, trees, weather phenomenon, birth, death, disease, war, astronomy and crops. That's what those tribes worlds were.The fact they all accept the universe was created (came into being) is one obvious uniformity.
How can that be a creation story if everyone lived under a tree. Could you elaborate?There is an African creation myth that stared with a big tree where everyone lived under the earth.
Again, I don’t see a “creation” storyAnother features an Eland which gets killed and angers the gods- South African. Elands are only found in Africa so that is not so surprising.
Same as aboveThere is another African religion featuring termites, https://ethnobiomed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13002-017-0137-z " San of southern Africa, termites were the first meat that God gave to humans, before all other animal meat was created. The flying termites were associated with supernatural creative powers, and creation stories of the San relate that the first humans came from a termite nest, considered to be God’s house. That is probably the reason that in rock art of the San (Bushman) north of the River Limpopo in Zimbabwe termites’ nests are depicted"
Where is the creation story?One Chinese myth involves a giant turtle "In the Chinese mythology, the creator goddess Nüwa cut the legs off the giant sea turtle Ao (simplified Chinese: 鳌; traditional Chinese: 鰲; pinyin: áo) and used them to prop up the sky after Gong Gong damaged Mount Buzhou, which had previously supported the heavens.[4]"
Same as aboveThere is a Korean myth involving gods battling out by growing flowers, we have two suns and moons at point in that one.
I could go on but my point is that:
What is a creation myth in your understanding?1.The creation myths reflect the time, culture, terrain flora and fauna of those tribes.
These stories already contain nature and gods which are “created”. These are more like folklores, or superstition.2.Some have similarities that are occupied in the same geographical region but evolve over time as the tribes come and go so the myths are adopted adapted and rehashed.
3.The vast majority bear no resemblance in to each other
All indications as stated are that the creation stories are inventions of those tribes.
Folklore or superstition?How can that be a creation story if everyone lived under a tree. Could you elaborate?
Again, I don’t see a “creation” story
Same as above
Where is the creation story?
Same as above
What is a creation myth in your understanding?
These stories already contain nature and gods which are “created”. These are more like folklores, or superstition.
It a creation story.Folklore or superstition?
No, that is the one you are familiar with. You have clearly not read any of the African, Chinese, south American etc. Some of them bear no resemblance whatsoever to each other. That is because they are inventions of that particular tribe and time.It a creation story.
“In the beginning God created the Heavens and the Earth”
That’s a creation story
Do you regard your failure as something to laugh about? Interesting.lol!!
I find your failure as something to laugh aboutDo you regard your failure as something to laugh about? Interesting.
I am familiar with quite a few, and they are basically the same. A creation story is the creation of this material manifestation. The creator has to be transcendent to such a manifestation.No, that is the one you are familiar with. You have clearly not read any of the African, Chinese, south American etc. Some of them bear no resemblance whatsoever to each other. That is because they are inventions of that particular tribe and time.
Well that is the problem then. There are more than "quite a few" and they are not "basically the same."I am familiar with quite a few, and they are basically the same
???I find your failure as something to laugh about