@ Clueless.
You could give infractions for correct spelling.
You could give infractions for correct spelling.
The problem isn't that there are mods who don't know their behavior is poor, it's that they have no pushback from within their own ranks. James said himself, when bans are given out, there is rarely any internal commenting.
Anyway, enough of this. This isn't the thread for it. Clueluss is trying to decide whether or not its worth it to be a mod.
@ Clueless.
You could give infractions for correct spelling.
Well yes thats somptin that coud be considered... an if its determined a necessity for the betterment of Sciforums then...WAIT... you said correct spellin... oh... i see... you'r makin a joke... lol.!!!
There is nothing particularly gratifying about it. It is more of an exercise in how much bullshit you can stand.
This thread is especialy for current mods an people who have been mods... an anybody elses 2 cents worth.!!!
Im givin serous consideration to applyin for a moderator job... but first i want to gather information to make sure it would be a good fit for me.!!!
One thang i woud like to know is... what are some of the most gratifying parts of the job.???
Special note to current mods:::
In case the moderation rules become mor strict durin the life of this thred... please warn anybody if they break a rule... instead of lockin the thread... thank you in advance.!!!
I used to moderate the Astronomy forum and only moderated posts of religious nature, offering only simple warnings to folks who posted them there. I don't believe I ever banned anyone, imsc.
The best forums are those least moderated.
Best to some, worst to others.(Q) said:The best forums are those least moderated.
I used to moderate the Astronomy forum and only moderated posts of religious nature, offering only simple warnings to folks who posted them there. I don't believe I ever banned anyone, imsc.
The best forums are those least moderated.
Best to some, worst to others.
Sciforums seems bogged down by mountains of rules... which only seems to necessitate more rules... ect... ect.!!!
Best for trolls, generally.
I used to moderate the Astronomy forum and only moderated posts of religious nature, offering only simple warnings to folks who posted them there. I don't believe I ever banned anyone, imsc.
The best forums are those least moderated.
Best for trolls, generally.
Notice how easy it is for you to insult people and get away with it, now that your part of the elite, above the rules.
Along wit mods bein respectful in ther duties... any name callin... such as "Troll"... is not the way to go.!!!
There is nothing particularly gratifying about it. It is more of an exercise in how much bullshit you can stand.
Notice how easy it is for you to insult people and get away with it....
Sometimes i wonder if the "payoff" for some mods to do this job is... a joy for the busy-work of endlessly perfectin an addin to the rules... an the drama in the mod forum... which even spills into the open forum on occasion.!!!
"Keep it simple stoopid"
Sciforums seems bogged down by mountains of rules... which only seems to necessitate more rules... ect... ect.!!!
I thank a goal for the forum shoud be arrived at... which certainly includes regular poster satisfaction/sense of fairness... an then the simplest plan of action that requires the least amount of moderation to acheive that goal shoud be arrived at... as the way to go for the betterment of Sciforums.!!!
No one was called a troll.
I dont thank mods shoud call people "Trolls" when speekin as a mod/performin ther mod duties... do you agree wit that.???