jayleew said:
Why is it so hard to accept the creation by faith. We open a can of greenbeans in faith that it is not going to poison us. We have faith that we won't be killed in a car accident on the way to work.
Don't confuse the "faith" required for religion with the "faith" that is actually nothing more than a matter of probability.
Every time you open a can of greenbeans "in faith", you are actually merely coming to the conclusion that you are
probably not going to die from being po1soned. It's a matter of probability. Nothing more. And it's entirely subconscious.
If you had three cans of greenbeans, and you and two friends opened one each, and the other two died from poison before you ate yours, would you still eat from yours? No? Why not? Do you not have "faith" in your greenbeans anymore? Or is it because subconsciously the odds are now not what they are that yours isn't po1soned.
This is the same "faith" that you place in friends.
You say you have "faith" in them because you have built up, subconsciously, through cummulative direct observation, a probability that they will continue to perform as such.
Likewise, you don't place "faith" in a stranger - you take a gamble that they will act according to your wishes - again this is probability. You probably wouldn't be surprised if they didn't act according to your wishes.
Religious "faith" is different.
This requires an absolute belief (i.e. 100%) that you are correct, on zero previous actual observation.
There is no probability that you might be wrong - despite logic to the contrary.
p.s. why is this site filtering out the word "po1soned"?