When law abiding civillians are well armed most violent crime disappears.
Bull. Most violent crimes are crimes of passion and having more armed people greatly increases the amount and severity of such crimes.
When law abiding civillians are well armed most violent crime disappears.
for the yanks who seem to belive that the gun is the only form of politics i ask when would you physically pick up that weapon and start resisting?
Tiassa has posted MANY examples of surposed freedoms being stripped away that would give people on BOTH sides of the political fence the excuse they need so when would you do it?
what would make you do it?
Now for a really good question, at what point would the courts rule you not guilty based on the second amendment for taking the life of a pollie, a cop or a solder?
Bull. Most violent crimes are crimes of passion and having more armed people greatly increases the amount and severity of such crimes.
Bull. Most violent crimes are crimes of passion and having more armed people greatly increases the amount and severity of such crimes.
The only good reason for the second amendment is self-defense, ie, a criminal breaks into your house and is threatening you, your family, etc. Also hunting (for food, not for sport).
Personally I would never use a gun on anyone except in self-defense. I would not use it against the cops or the government, I do not think it is a political expression... but I do think the second amendment is right.