Fraggle Rocker, gmilam and Buddha12, I was mainly using them and Aerosmith as an example to point out that bands or when you have a larger pool of collaborators than people on their own so they last longer. There are exceptions to every rule though.
Tony Bennett.
To me the Rolling Stones BECAME THE ROLLING STONES in the 70s. Exile on Main St., which came out in 1972, was when the writing and musicianship surpassed anything they did in the 60s. Just a matter of taste though.
We musicians hear music differently from other people. We evaluate the writing and the musicianship. Everyone else just judges a song by how much it moves them.
Some songs are really simple and require very little skill to play or sing, yet they rouch us deeply.
There were a lot of musical innovations in the 1960s that just blew us away. Technology had a lot to do with it, of course: the vast improvement in the electronics of guitar amplifiers, and of course the invention of the synthesizer. The tenor saxophone, once arguably the mainstay of the rock'n'roll sound, virtually vanished at this time. But the songwriting also underwent changes; genres were merging and new ones were created: folk-rock, soul, acid rock, progressive rock and heavy metal all debuted in that decade. Very few rock stars wrote their own songs in the 1950s (Little Richard and Paul Anka come to mind), but the Beach Boys, the Beatles and the Stones changed all that, and in the late 1960s the singer-songwriter movement yielded an entire new type of music: songs sung with intense emotion by the people who wrote them and therefore knew what they were about.
Janis Joplin be damned, Kris Kristofferson told us what "Me and Bobby McGee" was
about: the 1960s had to end because
our women grew up.
Somewhere near Salinas I let her slip away, looking for the home I hope she'll find.
Every one of us hippie guys had that experience.
But I'd trade all my tomorrows for a single yesterday, holding Bobby's body next to mine.
And every one of us hippie guys has a memory just like that, that will haunt us till our dying day.
Lately i have been getting into old Surf music, Funk and Rockabilly type bands.
I call rockabilly the first glimmering of real rock'n'roll music. The country music of the late 1940s and early 1950s already had most of the elements of rock: blues modality, a backbeat, and improvised instrumental solos. But real rock'n'roll added something that went far beyond ragtime, Dixieland, swing or bluegrass: an exaggerated syncopation that utterly
required a strong backbeat to keep the timing steady.
As far as todays music goes, the new or past decade or so blues players\bands are just as good or in many cases better than the older blues stuff. None of this gets played on the radio but i was amazed once i started searching it out.
People get tired of old styles of music. This is, of course, a modern phenomenon. Up through the 18th century, musical styles remained popular for hundreds of years. But then composers like Chopin, Wagner and Rimsky-Korsakov began expanding the boundaries of formal music (what we now call "classical" even if it's written in the 21st century). At the same time, industrial technology expanded the potential of popular music.
New musical instruments were invented, notably wind instruments with valves that could play the complete chromatic scale. But even more important from our standpoint: the steel-string guitar. The tonal and dynamic range of this instrument (which Sears-Roebuck sold by mail order for two dollars) turned the itinerant folksinger into a one-man band who could play music for dancing! It's no exaggeration to say that this instrument
created the Delta blues, the ancestor of modern popular music.
No, people don't want to hear old-time blues anymore, or even rockabilly. But every time we listen to Pitbull, Katy Perry, Mumford & Sons, or any other contemporary popular singer or band, we're hearing the echoes of all that music that came before and made this possible.