It is unfortunate & by this time disgusting that you cannot come to the table willing to discuss the topic of the thread (or just stay out of it) without taking it off into unrelated bullshit.
long live the reductionist paradigm of consciousness, eh/
Its unfortunate that you cannot come to the table in this regard
All that is clear is that you can't do things as you can normally do things in your current experience of them.I don't see any relevance to what was stated and an expected response to it. The fact is, if I'm dead and can't do anything, then I can't do anything and the original question becomes moot. I answered the original question on the basis that I could. If I can't, I can't - what more do you want?
Your atheism (at least as far as you have explained it) is accommodated by christianity.What? You claimed that "atheism covers a broader spectrum in its proper application". I have stated that in it's "proper application", atheism means not believing in gods and - by not believing in any of them, it doesn't get any "broader". Kindly explain your statement. There wont be any 'table' unless you establish what you mean by your rather bizarre statements. Do tell me lg, what exactly is "atheism in its proper application"?
All that is clear is that you can't do things as you can normally do things in your current experience of them.
Your atheism (at least as far as you have explained it) is accommodated by christianity.
I guess that would make you a christian atheist.
Is there anything you wouldn't do to avoid hell?
Perhaps ... but just a moment ago you were insisting on answering it on the scope of your experience (namely "after I'm dead, that's it"All that is clear is that you can't do things as you can normally do things in your current experience of them.
”
Given the scope of the question, I can.
All I was referencing was the "fact" within your "The fact is, if I'm dead and can't do anything" and where radical reductionism takes the gauntlet.If you want to re-ask the question with a "you can't" then feel free to ask it. Wont get many answers I wouldn't have thought.
Perhaps I forgot to also include the bit about your discomfort about moving outside of issues accommodated by christian atheism (hence the whole thing about coming to the table of atheism etc etc)“
Your atheism (at least as far as you have explained it) is accommodated by christianity.
I guess that would make you a christian atheist.
”
Unusually bizarre statement but... ok? Might I ask how that even attempts to answer my question?
You claimed that "atheism covers a broader spectrum in its proper application". I have stated that in it's "proper application", atheism means not believing in gods and - by not believing in any of them, it doesn't get any "broader". Kindly explain your statement.
That I live in a christian dominated society and as such spend more time debating christians and christian concepts is par for the course. It doesn't answer the question.