It's said that faith doesn't need proof but is it actually that faith is accepted as proof? If so, why is 1 person's faith more acceptable proof than another's?
1111
1111
What would be proof of god(s)?
- Thread starter StrangerInAStrangeLand
- Start date
"pure spirit" is an imaginary concept with no basis in observable reality.
I cannot see God, therefore he does not exist.
God does not exist, because he cannot be seen.
What I can see is the sum total of all there is.
To see is to know, to know is to see....
jan.
I am in Brazil so must ask: Have the Great Lakes turned to wine yet?
See:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2066981&postcount=67
to know how this relates to the existance or not of God.
See:
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=2066981&postcount=67
to know how this relates to the existance or not of God.
"They" - are you a polytheist? Most humans are and all have been in the past. I sort of like the idea of specialized Gods. - If you need rain, ask the rain God would seem to be more efficient than expecting one girl God to handle all requests. - More personalized service etc.
Specialization is the key to high productivity and good performance on Earth anyway. As for whisky I think that is not in Bachaus's area of responsibility - not sure there is a God of whisky. I think distilation is relative recent development for boosting the proof. Multiple Gods probably were dying out as science progressed to level of making a still.
Yes you are correct. My dyslexica got me to see "turn it into whisky." Probably into was the source of extra "it" I read.He's referring to the Great Lakes with "they"
Last edited by a moderator: