So massive is the HIV/ AIDS conundrum, in sheer numbers of supposed victims, so massive is the US NIH a factor in determining the direction of global research and therapeutic systems into the equation that the slighrtest misstep could prove very dangerous correct?/quote]
No.
Especially as the NIH and virtually any one of prominenece in the FDA NIH, NAIDS, CDC etc could be designaed to take a few hours and prepare a 10 document list.
Why is it their job to do your research for you? It's there. Peer-reviewed papers intended for use and scrutiny by other biologists in this particular field. You need to have a background in biology to understand some of the jargon associated with the field.
Show me what you have, and don't whine that I am being unreasonable. Show me what ypu've got. Show mw ypour best stuff.
I don't have access to many of the most recent papers. You have the same access. I have pointed you to several papers, by means of the abstract. You can shell out the $10 and read it a couple times.
Idlel Mind you once criticised a post of mine stating the biosciences were different than the physical sciences refarding the issue of accepable proof
You throw around the word 'proof' much too loosely. Proof is absolute.
Nothing is proven. So, if you are looking for the absolute, then you will be disappointed.
I have shown you that HIV exists. They have sequenced every protein, every gene of the virus, and they have done so for many of the various strains. I have linked papers that show that the HIV virus infects and destroys CD4+ T-cells, which are an important part of the immune system (well, DeeCee has). Why would the scientists researching HIV create a phantom mechanism for infection?
Basic immunology shows that a decrease in T-cell numbers results in a depression of the host's immune system, and makes them more vulnerable to infection. AIDS patients also show a decrease in CD4+ T-cells. Many patients that have tested positive for HIV develop AIDS-like symptoms due to a decrease in T-cells.
Why is this such a leap of faith for you? It's a logical flow that has been scrutinized for decades. I would love it if HIV didn't exist. It would mean, however, that a lot more research was required regarding AIDS. The fact is, however, that HIV does exist, and that many (95%) people that test positive for HIV develop AIDS. So, let's move past that, and start trying to develop workable treatments.
I have no more to say on the matter.