What is time??

[Dywyddyr]

not without depth and breadth

Er, does a "cup full" not imply depth and breadth?

For the THIRD time:
What is the substance of length?
Can you give me a cup full of length?

 

[river]

“ now take away time ”

Beside the point.
Time is not a spatial dimension, therefore to expect it to work like one is rather silly.

so what is time if not a spatial ?

 

[river]

the object still exists because the fundimental dimensions that make up the object still exist ”

Fundamental dimensions do not "make up an object".

what dimensions does then ? make up an object

 

[Dywyddyr]

so what is time if not a spatial ?

How about a non-spacial dimension?

Fourth time of asking:
What is the substance of length?
Can you give me a cup full of length?

 

[AlexG]

what dimensions does then ? make up an object

It would appear from this that you don't know what a dimension is.

 

[river]

“ time is just the measurement of the movement of the objects themselves ”

And if they don't move there's no time?

exactly

if no objects move then what is time based on ?

 

[Dywyddyr]

what dimensions does then ? make up an object

An object is made up of the materials from which it is constructed.
An object exists in the dimensions of length, breadth and depth (and time) but it isn't "made up of them".

 

[Dywyddyr]

exactly
if no objects move then what is time based on ?

So if I leave my book on the shelf it won't get any older?

 

[river]

An object is made up of the materials from which it is constructed.

of course

An object exists in the dimensions of length, breadth and depth (and time) but it isn't "made up of them".

true

the object is made from what they are , but in order to manifest an object needs certain qualities , to manifest

which they all have , length ,depth and breadth

time irrelevent

because time , to the object contributes no qualitiy

 

[Dywyddyr]

the object is made from what they are , but in order to manifest an object needs certain qualities , to manifest
which they all have , length ,depth and breadth

No, it's the other way round: if the dimensions didn't exist then the object couldn't manifest.

time irrelevent
because time , to the object contributes no qualitiy

I can only repeat AlexG's post here:

Prove it.
Demonstrate it in some way other than your unsupported assertion.

Still waiting, by the way:
What is the substance of length?
Can you give me a cup full of length?

 

[AlexG]

because time , to the object contributes no qualitiy

Time contributes the objects exsistance. If an object does not have duration, it doesn't exist.

 

[river]

“ Originally Posted by river
the object is made from what they are , but in order to manifest an object needs certain qualities , to manifest
which they all have , length ,depth and breadth ”

No, it's the other way round: if the dimensions didn't exist then the object couldn't manifest.

so how does dimensions do that , without the object to create the dimension ?

 

[Dywyddyr]

so how does dimensions do that , without the object to create the dimension ?

Huh?
An object doesn't create the dimension. The dimension must exist before the object can do so.
If there were no third spacial dimension then there could be no 3D objects.

 

[wlminex]

Time contributes the objects exsistance. If an object does not have duration, it doesn't exist.

. . . for one of a few times, AlexG . . .I agree with you!

 

[river]

Time contributes the objects exsistance. If an object does not have duration, it doesn't exist.

and that is based on the object its self , not on duration or time

 

[Dywyddyr]

and that is based on the object its self , not on duration or time

What?
Your sentence has no meaning.

 

[wlminex]

. . . anyone recall Wheeler's statement defining spacetime . . . posted elsewhere a few weeks ago . . . something like "time" is what keeps everything from happening at once, and "space" is what keeps it from happening to me!"

 

[river]

Huh?
An object doesn't create the dimension. The dimension must exist before the object can do so.

how though

If there were no third spacial dimension then there could be no 3D objects.

you have not explained HOW though

 

[AlexG]

how though




you have not explained HOW though

I don't think HOW is applicable. It exists. It is a direction, in which there is the ability to transform coordinates, i.e. 'move'.

 

[wlminex]

What is time? . . . time for another beer!