So, as a natutralist, your only understanding of human emotions boils down to some chemical formula.
No. That is its ultimate essence, although as a person I appreciate the other meaning of happiness; or at least, I can allow my acceptance of their existence outside the chemical meaning on "faith". Frankly, do they have an existence aside from this in reality?
If you feel insulted that is your problem because all I sais w3as that you had not given the type of answer you were seeking.
The type of answer I was seeking? Please rephrase. Your response is garbled.
Does one have to be a naturalist to say that happiness is happiness ? That's what I call a fine answer.
Your answer is what I call strong misinterpretation. I don't think you really understand my comments.
Best,
Geoff