Right and wrong are concepts which require differentiation. The ability to differentiate is innate since man's innate nature (as that of a child) is towards virtue.
So are we now better able to differentiate than before?
Is right and wrong always black and right? Can there not be something that is right for me and wrong for you (say eating crackling pork?
or denying the existence of God(s) or visa versa, say ....???
Once someone comes along and says – for now and forever, eating port = SIN and denying god = SIN then there maybe a short period (couple hundred years) of prosperity as all ducks are put in a line - then there will be stagnation. Sure, some basic right should be held to, no matter what, I think the Declaration of Independence put them nicely. However, there must be allowances made for society to change, prosper and thus progress.
Take a look at what happened to Xian Europe as they delineated what was wrong and what was right. For a time, perhaps, it was OK - as everyone came to agree to certain social morals and these were good for society: No, one should not steal from one’s neighbor, no, one should not kill out of spite, etc… however, the more these rules intrude into ones personal lives the more stagnate a society becomes: Do not engages in homosexual behavior (even the thoughts are wicked), do not eat pork, do not drink alcohol, do not blaspheme God, do not even think it….
Another interesting example, perhaps, is the stagnation that occurred towards the end of the Tokugawa Shogunate or the People Republic in China. Sure, maybe for awhile it works – but then it stops working.
Or so it would seem to me?
Michael