What did I see... UFO?

Reiku

Banned
Banned
Maybe i am being a bit harsh on where to place this thread... after all, the following is true, and the real definition of UFO is anything flying in airspace that is unidentified.

The following is a true story. Please keep spamming to a minimum.

''Do you believe in the existence of extraterrestrials?''
Fox Mulder to Dana Scully (Pilot Episode)

Yes. I do. And here are three reasons why:

1. That in the 1990's in Scotland, Dunoon in the Argyle, (my home town), i experienced a most fantastic phenomena. I was a young child at the time; but i remember the experience as though it where yesterday. I remember looking out of my mother and fathers home one dark winter’s night, and i saw something... something that made me screw my face, because, even though i did not know how aerodynamics worked - i did know what types of spacecraft we had at the time, and it did not match up. Three distinct lights (of brilliant vibrance), cascaded high above my house in a beautiful dance - though, a complicated one at that, and i can tell you now today, that no earthly-built aircraft could manoeuvre like what these lights where doing: thus, i called my parents... and we all stood out in the dark open with our eyes fixated to the skies, in incredible awe. Jaw's open - quite literally. They performed a dance that would rotate around each other in almost pure symmetry, then merging together - like a single force - then splitting away from each other, before disappearing into the deep dark of the night skies, as though they speeded away faster than sound itself. If their are doubters of my claims out their, which there inexorably always is, it wasn't just witnessed by my self and my family - but by quite a few people throughout the town. It was noted that week in the 'Local Dunoon Observer;' so, I’m not as eccentric as some might have assumed.

2. Now - the second reason extends from the first. Here, my scientific and mystical mind go hand-in-hand. First of all, if it wasn't a product of an earth air-craft, since i can deduct this from its sophisticated manoeuvres throughout the sky, then one might assume it was some light source, located miles away. However, an investigation occurred and found no results of any light activity from any of the surrounding towns - and since Dunoon is arched in by mountains, the major cities like ''Glasgow'', is simply far too much of a distance. If it was cast from Glasgow, it would have needed to be a very powerful, focused beam... and even beams that are seen from reasonable distances, can still be known to be from some torch light source - but these 'Luminiferous objects', as i said, where extremely vibrant, and did not look as though they where a by-product of some distant source... it might as well have been cast right from our back garden it was that bright.

3. But i hear Occam rolling in grave... What if it was but some kind of electrical phenomena? Well, I’m no expert on natural electrical phenomena, such as lightning, but i believe even lightning itself is not fully known how it operates. I heard a theory earlier this year, that it might be a product of ice frictions... but too long a story... but my point being, that if this is true, then it is quite possible actually that it could have all been a phenomenal electrical event... but when does the buck stop with knowledge, because eventually, logic becomes a lie, and everything falls down a disenchanted path, and lay's in scientific history as nothing but curiosity... In other words, not everything is governed by logic. Even the illogical assumptions bring with it its own type of legacy. So, might we turn to the fantastic, perhaps even the most incredible to discover the correct logical truth - no matter how illogical it may seem to be? Might the fantastic from time-to-time, be the most plausible assumption? Mathematics would state yes. But this is according to our calculations, highly improbable... However, is the improbable the most probable way to discover the truth about the mind-blowing, incomprehensible world we see around us?

I would like to believe what i saw that night was of extraterrestrial origin - even though the scientific child inside of me is telling me 'no - don't be stupid!' :bugeye: - because, how could another race achieve such a task as deep as intergalactic travel without coming to us when we are long gone, due to the relative laws?
Of course - is this not the argument that is self-explanatory? After all, wouldn't aliens be more intelligent than us? Perhaps they discovered the mysterious ''Tachyonic Matter,'' and achieved great spacetime distances, without really taking any time at all? What if they have mastered the unified theory long before us, and came to our planet, 100,000 years ago - and they, as some conspiracists state, 'created us,' and, 'monitors us'... even though i don't believe in this theory, i can imagine some strange interpretations; one being that if they did genetically construct humans, they are then our gods... But - please - don't mistake me here - it is incredibly improbable... but that's the great thing about theories. If at least a statistical value of anything happening, whether that be 1 in 10^100, it is still possible.

Of course - other, more rational ''things'' can be brought into play here. First of all, aliens must exist, due to the high probability factor of infinite spacetimematter - thus out in that wide cosmos, we cannot be, according to these statistics, be the only ''life'' out there... whether that be intelligent life or not. There is simply far too much space and matter, and equally proportional to its infinite possibilities, that we cannot be the only life existent within this great expanding vacuum.
And, equally logical, is that if they are alien to us, what are we to them? I'm sure you guessed that we too would be aliens - thus, using this deduction, ask yourself again, 'do aliens exist?'

Yes... they do. I am one sitting here right now, as you are sitting there reading this.

Reiku :m:
 
So if one SEES an object flying then wouldn't it be an Identified Flying Object? IFO for short.
 
No, that would be an oxymoron, because then you are lying, since you don't actually know what it is you are observing. Yes, you've identified an unidentified flying object, but you do not know of what origin.
 
No. it's a legit UFO. Now could you tell if these objects had mass? could you see if there were a fuselage?
On your 2nd from last point, 70quintrillon stars, it's looking more and more like most of them have planets. I think the last count that I saw was 200 observed planets outside of our system. So yes, odds are good that we have neighbors. But the closest possible one is 4.5 years away at the speed of light (C) so without some type of loophole it's darned unlikely that we'll ever meet.
Please explain your last point.
 
Last edited:
The closest i would say was the orb-sphere (three of them... draqon). Quite amazing actually.
 
''Please expllain your last point.''

Can you highlight which point you are referring to please?
 
''Please expllain your last point.''

Can you highlight which point you are referring to please?

I was refering to

Yes... they do. I am one sitting here right now, as you are sitting there reading this.

Are you claiming to be E.T.? or a native of another country? being funny? just asking for clarifacation.
 
Last edited:
Oh right...\

Well... think logically; If they are aliens to us, what are we to them?

Zoo. ;)

LON901D_BRITAIN_0825_03500x333.JPG
 
You know, I have to admit...there seems to be a lot of supportive evidence for the UFO phenomenon. Airline pilots that call in sightings (well, not any more, apparently), sightings with hundred of citizens, military personnel. It does seem a bit likely.
 
I once saw something similar, tiny bright spots high up in the sky. They were flying in some random pattern but stayed more or less in the same area. I don't know what they were but I guess it was some sort of atmospherical effect or ball lightning or something.
I don't think e.t.'s would busy themselves flying random patterns. Anyhow, they looked natural in origin.
 
No, that would be an oxymoron, because then you are lying, since you don't actually know what it is you are observing. Yes, you've identified an unidentified flying object, but you do not know of what origin.

But I know what I'm seeing, it is there right in front of me, so why is it a UFO then.
 
But I know what I'm seeing, it is there right in front of me, so why is it a UFO then.

If you saw an animal in the forest but you didn't get a clear enough look at it to say what kind of animal it was, would you say you identified it ?
 
Back
Top