lol
I agree he should specify more explicitly. He did however agree with me that the cause is genetic.
Enmos, Continuing the query on the nature of the morphological blue print, let me diverge slightly. The distinct and recognizable body states common to all humans is reflected generally, in infancy, up to 5 or 6 years, pre-puberty, puberty and so on as the human ages.
If the process was not confined to more or less well recognized time spans in the human, that is, were the growth and aging process a continuous flow with no temporal step functions it would be easier to adopt a deterministic outlook and conslude that "it's all chemical".
However, does it not seem reasonable to prescribe the quality of 'latency' to blue prints being activated in a recognizable sequence. Beside noses growing larger with age, there are other physical characterisrics of human nature that permit a horizontal classification of human morphology. The similarlities in the developing teeny bopper morphology maps the temporal consistentcies of phyisically developing matter. There is obvious physical structure similarlities taking place on roughly parallel horizontal planes. Pubic hair, organ development - breasts, armpits , just see all manifestly developing with some multi-body coordination process inferred.
The qustion is, what is the nature of the blue print, which we can reasonably assume is also the force center(?), that when triggered, operates as the command, control, communication and information management process.- the signal activity must be quite complex, that is, highly ordered,
Enmos, I cannot believe, or accept, that DNA is the store house, the repository, of all organic activity - the 'morphic field concept' while begging the question does offer suggestion for perusal and scrutiny.
geistkiesel:shrug:
