New Atheist
Registered Member
You said:
The studies you cited do not support that, though.
We would need studies of people who were non-religious, in great distress (clinically depressed, long-term unemployed, chronically severely ill and such) and who then joined organized religion expressedly viewing it as a tool to "cope with life as it is".
Comparing people who have been religious since early childhood or for a long time with people who have not been religious at all cannot lead to instructive results, since such a comparison trivializes the problems and challenges that a person faces when they try to become religious as adults.
Show me people who consider themselves both genuinely religious, who are respected members of religious communities - and who also believe that their religiousness is merely a tool for coping with life as it is because they lack any other adaptive coping mechanisms.
If religious people themselves do not view their religiouness as a mere coping tool, then the psychological abstraction that you work with is just speculation, based on the assumption that religiousness is for weaklings.
Well Sig, no clue what you just said. I agree with everything Wisdom Seeker wrote here. Religion, right or wrong, is a support structure. Some things are so evident they need no proof. This is one of them. Religion (all of them) may be wrong and a lie but they help a swath of society fit in and cope. "Weaklings" (in your workds) may be so, but none the less, you seem to only understand one aspect of Natural Selection and evolution - and that is collaboration is more important than competition. and without that segment of society, humanity will not make the next leap.
I'd really like to see how you put this down Signal. C'mon, lets hear it.