DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Great. I guess all I have to do is post some links to some books about debunking pseudo-science and I can say I've countered your argument?
What are Ghost/spirits made of?
- Thread starter JordanTredray
- Start date
https://www.csicop.org/si/show/playing_with_past_lives_the_virginia_boy_and_the_dead_marine
Interesting , the site refers to Brian Weiss and others but not to Michael Newton . I don't know why .
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
If I wanted a reading list, I'd go to Wikipedia and look at the references. This is a discussion board. I expect discussion.
But I'm guessing by your last link there that you see both sides of the issue? Since it's essentially debunking the stories?
If you would explain the reason you provide a given link, I wouldn't have to guess at your intent.
But I'm guessing by your last link there that you see both sides of the issue? Since it's essentially debunking the stories?
If you would explain the reason you provide a given link, I wouldn't have to guess at your intent.
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Looks like a little reminder of site Posting Rules and Guidelines is in order.
* let alone nothing at all
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/sciforums-site-rules.142880/#post-3236597
* let alone nothing at all
Oh well, Skeptiko... surprise, surprise, River links to yet another nutcase web site run by a dishonest idiot who wouldn't know science if it bit him.
Prove your point .
FFS can't you even check a link?
What is the problem ?
Mainly you and your overwhelming (and wilful) ignorance.
You asked me to "prove my point" when I'd already provided a link that supported what I'd written.
can't find it , what post #
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Post 107.
Ninja link styling strikes again.
Ninja link styling strikes again.
The one where I made the f*cking claim!
Try mousing over the last few words of the sentence.
so you have no post # , get with it . your link is your problem . I have found no link .
DaveC426913
Valued Senior Member
Dude. Post 107.
It's there. Roll your mouse over Dy's text.
Blame the forum for poor usability.
1) Given that the post in question is directly prior to your post "asking" for a link, and
2) I explicitly stated which post it's in AND where it is, plus
3) Dave gave you the post number
THEN claiming that "you found no link" is only demonstrating that you'd rather present yourself as irredeemably stupid rather than admit you made an error.
I was looking for your link not mine .
2) where explicitly stated the post it is in And where it is plus
you did not give the post # number someone else did .
therefore you had no idea what you were on about . talk about stupid .
I know. I was talking about mine.
One more time: the last few words of the sentence (which I told you in post #114).
Oh, you caught me out! After all what I wrote was "3) Dave gave you the post number" (please note that that's NOT a claim that I gave a post number. What I wrote was "the post in question is directly prior to your post "asking" for a link").
I think that it's fairly obvious who doesn't know what they're on about.