we have "evil" , now we need "good"

good and evil as property of our specy

I am disagree with you guys again. And proposition that 'good and evil are properties of mankind' has to be changed to 'good and evil are properties of any intellectual beings'; intellectual beings are any beings that consider themselves more than just a machines for eating, drinking, copulating and sleeping (and machines like that are animals, because they are determined beings - always react in an identical way). So, that's all, in short.
---
Avatar:
Mâjaslapu dizains vajag priekð tiem, kas nespçj koncentrçt uzmanîbu ilgâk par 2 min vienas lapas aplûkoðanai; manâ lapâ galvenais ir saturs. Par operu nezinu, pats lietoju eksploreri, un nekâdu probzu nav.
 
Oldschool thinker:

'First of all, anything can't be good unless something is defined as evil. One exists because of the other. They are complements. If everything was good, there would be no evil, and there would be no good because good exists because of evil. You cant have one without the other. Both of there meanings complement each other.'
---
Disagree. We can evaluate any action as good or evil in accordance with its vector - is this action constructive and helps to develop anything or is it destructive? If action is very complex and consists from several different vectors, the base criteria for evaluating 'good/evil' will a sum of all these vectors.
And also is possible, that this vector will be perpendicular to the axis of 'good/evil'; in such case the action can not be considered as 'good' or 'evil'; it will be neitral.
 
"(and machines like that are animals, because they are determined beings - always react in an identical way). "

small stepps XPEH, small steps.
 
Agree with Tom York. Human beings are harmful on the Earth in the relation with another species and environment. The Earth would be better place, if there were no mankind. :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top