One must percieve each situation he enters as part of the flow, rather than investing personal significance in it, whether it is "good" or "bad". For instance, one might see a friend in the distance, and think it "good", but while running to meet him break his leg; breaking his leg, he might think is "bad"; but the person in the distance turns out to be a soldier coming to draft him for war, so the break is "good". Seeing his friend is both perceived as "bad" and "good"; breaking his leg is perceived as both "bad" and "good". One must quench inner conflicts and value judgments in order to "go with the flow" of the universe, which is tied together in one organic creature, and is neither intrinsically "good" nor "bad".
and I like to think of myslef as sometimes being evil
probably because I strongly dislike those people who go around and help others by nothing getting themselves - I duno why
I seem to think that they are weak people
f you were able to use logic and reasoning the moment you were born...what would you consider good and evil? I would say pain would be evil...and everything else is good.
Any concept of good and evil can only exist in the dimension of time.
But as a new born you will have no knowledge that it can amplify passion, that it can teach you something....until you experience it.Pain is by no means evil. It can serve us, sometimes by amplifying passion, sometimes by teaching us.
orìinâli, bet bûtu mazliet pie dizaina jâpiestrâdâNu, un ka majaslapa?
uz Operas paradas, pameginaju uz IE, bet uz ta bija keburi.Interesanti, latvieshu burti paradisies vai ne?
I put "christians" in quotation-marks and a laughing smiley besideIn fact I disagree with Avatar thesis that we are standing in one foritification ring against our enemy (christhians).
Latvianurious. What language are you guys speaking?
Originally posted by Avatar
ok- so I propose that we label "good" and "evil" as subjective ethical concepts of our specie.
what do you think?
Latvian