Was Paul Gay?
- Thread starter skywalker
- Start date
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Was Paul Gay?
Not only Gay but More..............
Since we are talking about creater of Christianity, the man who created a greatest Hoax in the history of mankind, that is Christianty and let me present our beloved PAUL.
Why not see his character and see how Dishonest he was,
DISHONEST PAUL
Paul’s Confession of Ignorance
More!!
Paul’s Mystery: One Lie After Another
Paul’s Schism
Paul's Mythology
Paul’s Sin: Dulism
Please read. Randolfo it is not fabricated information, these are the facts, you can't deny. Admit it please, that you have been fooled by Paul and Infact Paul was the Anti Christ.
Since we are talking about creater of Christianity, the man who created a greatest Hoax in the history of mankind, that is Christianty and let me present our beloved PAUL.
Why not see his character and see how Dishonest he was,
DISHONEST PAUL
Paul’s Confession of Ignorance
More!!
Paul’s Mystery: One Lie After Another
Paul’s Schism
Paul's Mythology
Paul’s Sin: Dulism
Please read. Randolfo it is not fabricated information, these are the facts, you can't deny. Admit it please, that you have been fooled by Paul and Infact Paul was the Anti Christ.
Re: Not only Gay but More..............
Originally posted by Markx
Since we are talking about creater of Christianity, the man who created a greatest Hoax in the history of mankind, that is Christianty and let me present our beloved PAUL.
Why not see his character and see how Dishonest he was,
DISHONEST PAUL
Paul’s Confession of Ignorance
More!!
Paul’s Mystery: One Lie After Another
Paul’s Schism
Paul's Mythology
Paul’s Sin: Dulism
Please read. Randolfo it is not fabricated information, these are the facts, you can't deny. Admit it please, that you have been fooled by Paul and Infact Paul was the Anti Christ.
----------
M*W: Markx, these are excellent sites. We know these facts are true, but I'm afraid Christians will continue to make excuses for their co-dependency on their false demigod. Let's look at it this way: Their numbers are decreasing by the day. 75% of the planet doesn't believe Christianity doctrine. Those measly 25% are on their last leg. We've come a long way, baby!
I don't think Paul was gay. However I do think that the one that invented the technique to put the penis into the mouth after circumsition was gay...did they really do that??
If it was a common practise then there is no reason to assume that Paul was gay, if that must be true according to the premises then everyone that is circumsised must be gay also.
If it was a common practise then there is no reason to assume that Paul was gay, if that must be true according to the premises then everyone that is circumsised must be gay also.
Bells
Staff member
Ok I have to ask, does it matter IF he were gay? I'm sure homosexuality existed back then so what's the big deal?
IF he was gay, does it prove the hypocrisy of the Christian churches in their treatment of gays? I'd have thought that the hypocrisy was well established within Christian entities. So what's the big deal if he was gay? Does it make him any less of a man or person?
IF he was gay, does it prove the hypocrisy of the Christian churches in their treatment of gays? I'd have thought that the hypocrisy was well established within Christian entities. So what's the big deal if he was gay? Does it make him any less of a man or person?
Originally posted by Bells
Ok I have to ask, does it matter IF he were gay? I'm sure homosexuality existed back then so what's the big deal?
IF he was gay, does it prove the hypocrisy of the Christian churches in their treatment of gays? I'd have thought that the hypocrisy was well established within Christian entities. So what's the big deal if he was gay? Does it make him any less of a man or person?
Did any one imply in all of the above posts tha he was less of a person?
Bells
Staff member
Originally posted by Markx
Did any one imply in all of the above posts tha he was less of a person?
That's what I'm asking though. Why the horror at the thought he might be gay? Why the ridicule at the thought of it? All I'm saying that if he were in fact gay, it would only go to show the hypocrisy of the Christian based religions in their treatment of homosexuals.
It could also be that he was straight. And that the interpretation of the bible was incorrect, after all we have all seen the different meanings and interpretations of the bible by society through the ages.
Originally posted by Bells
That's what I'm asking though. Why the horror at the thought he might be gay? Why the ridicule at the thought of it? All I'm saying that if he were in fact gay, it would only go to show the hypocrisy of the Christian based religions in their treatment of homosexuals.
It could also be that he was straight. And that the interpretation of the bible was incorrect, after all we have all seen the different meanings and interpretations of the bible by society through the ages.
But it would be horrible for devout christians to accept that he was a gay or he had gay urges etc etc. Don't you think?
Bells
Staff member
You're asking the wrong person. I'm not a homophobe and even though my parents brought me up in a Christian household, what they taught me more was NOT to be a bigot against people, regardless of sex, colour, race, religion or sexuality. I asked my motherthis morning and she's a devout christian and her reply was "so what if he was gay". So I guess I asked the wrong person again since as she's not a homophobe either.
That isn't true!
1. Just because one asks a question with a serious face does not mean one beleives it! I have warned of his errors but he is ignorant to his ways. He can say things that are perfectly reasonable, and not in the slightest bit ludicrous, so one might as well assume everything he says is a lie, like the boy who cried wolf. I am not unaware of these things, and girls are the biggest culprits, so I take the approach that if they have told me something I will hold them to it. I constantly refer to such things, and ask them questions, and some people get the message, but he takes it that his 'folly' has been successful.
2. I didn't create the religion, I am merely a follower.
3. I beleive one thing that defines religion from other things is faith, and so far I can't see anything fake about it!
1. Just because one asks a question with a serious face does not mean one beleives it! I have warned of his errors but he is ignorant to his ways. He can say things that are perfectly reasonable, and not in the slightest bit ludicrous, so one might as well assume everything he says is a lie, like the boy who cried wolf. I am not unaware of these things, and girls are the biggest culprits, so I take the approach that if they have told me something I will hold them to it. I constantly refer to such things, and ask them questions, and some people get the message, but he takes it that his 'folly' has been successful.
2. I didn't create the religion, I am merely a follower.
3. I beleive one thing that defines religion from other things is faith, and so far I can't see anything fake about it!
Last edited:
And you don't think I can find a few threads where you spelled words wrong?
Of course it appears relative to you. One who is in darkness cannot see the light thus needing a savior. The one in insanity cannot see his own insanity. But no, it's not a matter of me not being able to handle opposing views. You are losing your touch with reality and are repeating religious mantras. It's you presenting your filthy gutter talk on a public forum without the shred of proof. Either present your proof of what you say or shutup. My mind appears closed because I have looked at all alternatives and once searched closed my doors to them. Your mind, however, is open with worm holes. You time and again tell out right lies such as Christians believing in a demigod.