Thoreau
Valued Senior Member
Oh... nevermind then. You're right, I'm not able to grasp the entirety of what your god is supposed to be. Before I'd assumed you just meant "life".
Its ok.
VitalOne's Fallacious Rants Against Atheism
- Thread starter VitalOne
- Start date
Its ok.
Not satisfactorily you didn't.
Ashura makes my point also. You are being dishonest in your methods, twisting definitions to suit your purpose.
If we took a poll, 'Do you believe in God' with the possible responses;
1, Yes
2, No
3, Don't know
and were asked to count up how many people were theists, which responses would you add up? Well, you'd only take the number that took option 1.
If you were asked therefore to calcalute the number of atheists, what numbers would you add up? Well, as atheist is a-theist, literally, 'not a theist' it's everyone who does not count themselves a theist, so it's ever option added up apart from option 1. It does not matter if agnostics do no label themselves atheists, but moreover that they do not label themselves 'theists'!
I can't make this any simpler, so if you can't understand it, you are lost. I think though, it is that you won't understand it, because admitting you are an atheist shoots down all of your own arguments.
Anyway, maybe you can spend the time of you ban coming up with an argument that isnt full of fallacies nd straw men? You've got two days, so it had better be good.
Ah, so you speak for atheists now? Was there an election?
I am an atheist, and I do care if there is evidence for abiogenesis, and well, there are some studies which demonstrate it's feasibility.
So again you build a straw man, and they try and burn it down with damp matches. You really do suck at debate.
By using your own version of "god of the gaps" argument, except turning it towards abiogenesis
We're all ready to take it to fact when it gets proved, or throw it away when a better solution comes up. You know... science...
dont bring it up again
Right, so basically your entire post addressed no arguments at all...I never said a lack of evidence for abiogenesis was evidence of design, I said atheists don't care if there's no evidence for it
Nice try though, amateur
Atheists also don't take it for a fact, you twat. It is one of many hypothesis that are currently being discussed and tested.
Design is not a viable explanation.
Yes I know to atheists personal experiences are not evidence of God, and atheists cannot give any example of what can be evidence of God besides "God coming down one day" or "reviving an amputee's leg"
All praise the atheistic faith
why dont you tell him why hes wrong instead of just responding with equal "ignorance"
Well why can't he just look up the argument from ignorance
let me just say....I am sooo glad your backYours is thew silliest post I have read so far. Try tyhinking, however painful you find it.
If you claim there is a god and I disagree , it is up to you to prove your point. not my job to disprove it.
If I claim I have fairies at the bottom of my garden and you cannot see them you are entitled to ask me to provide evidence. You cannot be expected to prove that they do not exist. If you try, I can counter what you say with all sorts of nonsense. I can say, the fairies do not wish to be seen by you, you are not worthy, they suspect a hostile presence, first you must believe in them, you must pray to them for faith . Once you have faith you will not need to see them because you will know they are there, so why trouble them by asking them to manifest for a mere mortal like you. Sound familiar ? It's the stuff of which religion is made
I do not dispute your rightto believe what you want to but don't ask me to join the club unless you can convince me that you have something to offer by way of evidence,
hahah, how do you assume I'm brainwashed? I know how, circular logic...great strategy
All the atheists should rejoice, no one else besides me can beat them up in an argument
ROFL...argument from ignorance...
Something isn't false until proven true
Sorry atheists, but evidence doesn't cause something to become true, you can't say something is false because of this...
Hmm...what does fairies have to do with this? Oh, I know nothing, it's just another typical atheistic analogy used to preserve the atheistic faith...Myles said:
Sorry, but the existence of fairies has absolutely nothing to do with the existence of God
What a typical atheist, instead of addressing the substance of the argument you dodged out of the entire thing, ofcourse I cannot give you evidence if nothing can be considered evidence
A better analogy is something like the many-worlds interpretation, there is no evidence because nothing can be considered as evidence, not because of an absence of evidence when evidence should be present...
Such a typical atheistic post
Last edited:
Uhm...how can you distinguish either atheism and theism from delusion?
Thoreau
Valued Senior Member
???? I doubt you will be punished for carrying on a conversation.
just one case of ireversibly complex structure in nature
Killian_1_4
Registered Senior Member
Man is guilty, but I have no evidence to support this.
Just because there is no evidence to support he is guilty doesn't mean he isn't guilty. BUT, because there is no evidence to support he is guilty, we should not convict him for the crime. atm, the man is irrelevant to the jury because there is no evidence supporting his involvment.
Likewise, just because there is no evidence to support God doesn't mean God doesn't exist. BUT, because there is no evidence supporting his existence, we should not assume he does exist. We should admit the possibility of his existence, but not worship him as if he does. If God exists, atm he is irrelevant to my life because he has not shown his existance.
Atheism is not the belief God doesn't exist, it is the lack of belief in his existance.