Why is "Mary" more related to "she", when cows are always female?
How does the parser relate seperate sentences?
How does the parser relate seperate sentences?
Baal Zebul said:If I was started with no knowledge about Language, then yes.
If i was started with a basic language that allowed me to learn more then No.
I simply see it as a excuse for not being able to solve the real problem.
Baal Zebul said:haha, you are so right BigBlueHead.
That is why i say that the previous pattern is neccesary in order to understand the future pattern/layers and current.
Btw, how does it deal with this:
I have a Cow.
I have a Wife named Maria.
She is married to a Bull.
Which She?
BigBlueHead said:Dennis, Dennis, Dennis. The human reader is not confused but is willing to accept several possibilities. For instance:
1) Baal has a human wife named Maria, and owns a cow that is married to a bull.
2) Baal is a bull (Baal Thebull, haha), who has a wife named Maria, and also owns a cow.
3) Baal has a wife named Maria who is also a cow and is married to a bull, whether it's him or not.
Which of these is the truth? Humans may weight the possibilities, but they also wait for more information.
How would your AI react to nonsense strings? Or, I guess the real question is, how does it connect phrases to real-world occurrences?
BigBlueHead said:Why is "Mary" more related to "she", when cows are always female?
How does the parser relate seperate sentences?
BigBlueHead said:Dennis, when I checked your website it was a series of dictionary definitions that all pointed to one another. It was a series of self-referential entries containing almost no information, which is why I originally wondered if the website itself had been created by a bot.
Try google query: Mary she
7.360.000 references
Try google query: Cow she
1.760.000 references.
Do you see now why?
BigBlueHead said:The point with the cow and bull example is that a human assessing the statement would seek other information to verify which of the interpretations is correct. Your AI cannot seek information from other contexts because it only parses text.
Baal Zebul said:That is not AI, the only thing that is that you have taken a previously Pre-programmed algorithm and shifted the data into databases. Unless you start it with NO knowledge i cannot see how it can come off as AI at all.
For instance, our discussion with you is about parsing text on both sides (you and me)
Baal Zebul said:My wife is fat as a Cow. She is named Mary.
? ? ?
Is She refering to Wife or Cow? A human would say Both, but you are saying that your AI would choose Wife over Cow.
BigBlueHead said:This is an intentional oversimplification and you know it. Talking is one of the last skills that humans learn, after many other experiences and skills are developed, and you're trying to put it first.
Baal Zebul said:Dennis, i started with some basic parameters and the ability to move a little (i think).
My parameteres where food, sleep i think.
Not, "How" , "Do" , "I" , "Obtain" , "Food".
I had to figure out how to obtain Food myself. Of course i had reflexes so that when it was time to feed me i just did my pre-programmed movement for this.
That is the difference between my AI and your "so called AI".
What we humans have i think is precisly within the boundries of Intelligence. Although i see no other way to make it better. I can only do a remake.
Baal Zebul said:1> My wife Mary is terrible sick. But i have my Cow.
2> How is she by the way?
k, google might tell you that the She is Mary but honestly. The state of Mary has already been disclosed so 2 is talking about the Cow of course.
Better luck next time.