amethyst08
Registered Senior Member
In his original post, Reiku wrote the Pisa, not the Eiffel tower. The leaning tower of Pisa was founded in 12th century, but I don't know whether Galileo dropped balls there or not
I'm sure most writers (I can't of course be sure of those that do write dissertations) tend to start with a "Skeleton". When they write a book they don't just start clicking away on a keyboard or typewriter not knowing the destination they intend to arrive, instead they will draw up a very simplified plan of where they are going. Perhaps they will have a Chapter title and a brief paragraph attempting to explain what they intend to do in that chapter.
They will then go about filling out their book, chapter by chapter. Again if they amend the storyline, they will change that skeleton to show where they are going. Some more indepth writers will even go as far as to write entity tables for the players in their story, in your case that's the Citation and Referencing.
Since the story when being bolstered with additional thoughts means those entities increase with information to generate a "real" character as opposed to something two dimensional. Those Entity tables are in a location where they are constantly updated, to mark those facts that change about the character.
In the instance of Citation and Referencing I would suggest doing something similar, so: you have the section for referencing already as you being and as you update you add to it. This way you aren't leaving it to last, it doesn't get left out.
In his original post, Reiku wrote the Pisa, not the Eiffel tower. The leaning tower of Pisa was founded in 12th century, but I don't know whether Galileo dropped balls there or not
I'm going to leave it there. About the quarks, i've been taught different. That's how gluon energy is created; the superfluous mass of the quarks is turned into energy to bind them together.
I never said what you said. I'm seriously going to James about this evaluation
This is what happens when you learn physics from comic books.
By all means, do so
A little birdie told me that this tutorial has appeared and was deleted from another science forum, where the person who posted it was a ]sockpuppet for a banned user.
So complain to James all you want---in fact, I encourage it. I like to have checks and balances---I want the administrators to monitor my work. It is, after all, their site. And if my opinions and judgments aren't in line with their philosophies, then I want them to find someone who can do the job that they want done.
If Stryder or Plazma or James ever thinks that this is the type of material that should be left in the physics forum, then I can't do my job, and they should find someone who is willing to accept this as science. No hard feelings, it's just a difference of philosophies. I do feel, however, fairly confident that this is the case---mostly because the last several bannings you've received didn't come from me.
Ok, then.Funkstar
If its like any of the so-called mistakes Ben pointed out, then don't bother.
They also fire such things as bean bags, rubber balls and rice.
Oh and has that Higgs been found yet Ben?
Do you remember your pact?
Ahhh right. Well, the latest FermiLab data I've seen has excluded a higgs at around 160 GeV, and below about 115 GeV.
And for the record, I never promised I'd step down as mod of the physics forum if they didn't find the higgs. If there was a qualified person who could (and would) step into the job, I'd definitely put that on the table.
Given you keep up to date with things happen at the LHC, either deliberately or by seeing stuff posted here, you know they haven't even collided the beams yet! So you're creating a strawman. It's an irrelevant question and you know full well that the current search for it is practically stopped, since CERN shuts down for winter and Fermilab simply doesn't have the power to cover the parameter space the Higgs can be found in.Oh and has that Higgs been found yet Ben?
Given a stationary object with mass M, I apply a constant force,100 Newtons, to it and 4 seconds it has travelled 250 metres. What is its mass?''In fact, the mass of the electron is one of the best measured numbers in all of physics.''
No its not. Do you remember the papers Vern directed you to, showing that all attempts to even measure a radius has failed? If we can't measure the radius, we cannot make a completely accurate number of its mass. In fact, I don't even think all scientists agree whether it truely is a poinlike entity.Oh and has that Higgs been found yet Ben?
In tutorials you MUST be precise. You are to assume you are talking to people who have never done this kinds of things before and just because you know something is only true in particular cases doesn't mean they do. If they don't understand, they'll assume things which you know are not always true. Ben knows you're not being entirely accurate but only because he knows certain things. How many maths students, pre university, assume all functions can be integrated and differentiated? Loads.And its Earth i am talking about. You really did just nit-pick at little things for an excuse.