Topless Women March for Right to Go Topless

Yeah. My one is a diagram of an adrenaline molecule, and underneath, a girl's eye with a huge dilated pupil. It's meant to symbolize life and energy....
If you'd like to, you could post it up? :) Even if you don't get the tattoo you sound like you'd enjoy expressing yourself artistically. I've always enjoyed producing forms of art. It's maybe one of the things I love about writing Chinese characters. Even if I'm 90% illiterate, when I put together a sentence and it has a nice "look" to it, well, I just love that :)

One other thing about tattoos. I think the skin type is important. I was thinking, we can easily make florescent proteins, I'm sure it's only a matter of time before we make florescent tattoos. That might be really cool, to have a tattoo that is only visible under UV light at a night club, but, otherwise isn't visible. hmmmmmm ..... has anyone invented that :shrug:
 
Then again, maybe these aren't as cool as I thought they'd look. I was picturing Navi' and jelly fish but all I ended up with was butt crack :p



40552024644bfbf6de30e5.jpg
 
FACT: In ancient Egypt, women were freely allowed to walk around bare-naked.

Check out Pharoah Hatshepsut:
Hatshepsut.jpg


Anyone who asserts that naked human bodies are "unclean" or "forbidden" or anything else of that nature is a person who is at war with their own species. The overriding fact is that this is how we are made.
 
FACT: In ancient Egypt, women were freely allowed to walk around bare-naked.

Check out Pharoah Hatshepsut:
Hatshepsut.jpg


Anyone who asserts that naked human bodies are "unclean" or "forbidden" or anything else of that nature is a person who is at war with their own species. The overriding fact is that this is how we are made.

huh?

How do those two statements support eachother?
 
Luminous Rose

WillNever said:

The overriding fact is that this is how we are made.

"God finds you naked and he leaves you dying. What happens in between is up to you." (Robyn Hitchcock)
 
I'm quite sure that my communication is sound. "I don't understand any of your post" is not helpful, however. Either you state which *specific* expressions in my sentences you are having difficulty comprehending, or I continue to suggest that you consult Barney and Friends.
 
I'm quite sure that my communication is sound. "I don't understand any of your post" is not helpful, however. Either you state which *specific* expressions in my sentences you are having difficulty comprehending, or I continue to suggest that you consult Barney and Friends.

Referring to ancient traditions by no means demonstrates that the ancient traditions of one country as Valid for modern melting pot society.
 
What has changed since then that would make such practices invalid, neverfly..?

This simply is not a valid argument.

In ancient Rome, many wore togas. And many other societies ran around clothed as well.

In ancient societies, superstition was the law of the land- as well as a large factor in sentencing.

What has changed since then that a trial for a witch should be handled differently?
In ancient Celtic tradition, an accused witch must remove three stones from a kettle of boiling water. If her hands did not heal in the specified time, then she was declared a witch.

Ancient practices have little sway in a modern argument.
 
Back
Top