Draqon, the very existence of illusion predicts objective reality.
Indeed we each have our own subjective realities. But behind all that there is an objective reality.
I can neither disagree or agree here...
Draqon, the very existence of illusion predicts objective reality.
Indeed we each have our own subjective realities. But behind all that there is an objective reality.
I can neither disagree or agree here...
How so ?
it is an illusion of objective reality...It both exists and it does not
Argh..
Objective:
not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion.
Subjective:
existing in the mind; belonging to the thinking subject rather than to the object of thought (opposed to objective).
its a bit too much of philosophical reasoning for me to tie it with general relativity concept. Perhaps I am making a mistake somewhere. But once you get to read general relativity concepts...can you please tie it with this objective and subjective thinking/reality? Ok?
Sure, when I get to it. Maybe I should refresh my memory on it.
Investigate the claims and embrace what He wills to embrace and reject what He wills to reject.
All Praise The Ancient Of Days
But how is that person supposed to know which 'he' is right?
nah...its better to read it over...and with mathematical formula backing it up...not just E=mc^2
but time relative to the observer and the traveler...and sorts.
Uhm, I hope you don't want me to back up objective reality by using mathematical formula's..
I do actually.
No one can do that.. it's an unrealistic request..
Einstein did it...its all behind the formulas he formulated. The relative truth to us all.
Uhm Draqon, we are hijacking the thread
but...if you reply to this last post I made about monotheists in our shoes and concept of general relativity for all of us to describe the reality for theists and non-theists...than we are talking about the topic and not hijacking this thread...just make sure you reply after me, so that if anything...I am not to be blamed.
I already did, it can't be done..
But.. monotheists in your shoes ? LMAO !! Poor monotheists LOL
but wait...who's shoes are those? relative to whom?
This simply means conforming to a previously determined standard. It provides no mechanism for the determination of the potential truth of religious beliefs. To take such a position offers no value to the debate or to anyone like the J.Smith's of the world.never encountered a normative or prescriptive description in scripture?