I was unable to translate this phrase from the English language.That makes L the contracted length, and L' the rest length.
I could not translate this phrase from the English language.
I was unable to translate this phrase from the English language.That makes L the contracted length, and L' the rest length.
In the problem of the two travelers and the dog: L '= L.L is the distance between the travellers in the reference frame in which they are moving with velocity v.
L' is the distance between the travellers in the reference frame in which they are at rest (i.e. in the reference frame moving along with the travellers).
My English is not good really.One of the ways Masterov dodges criticisms is by claiming he can't read it.
Other times he has no trouble at all.
You've always had a problem doing frame changes. That was clear from your touting of Andrew Banks's work.See my post to your friend.
Your notation is confusing. Why are you putting primes (') on your variables here? Why t' instead of t?In the problem of the two travelers and the dog: L '= L.
This little problem only shows that dog's times (in different directions) will be different:
$$t'_1=L/(c+v)$$
$$t'_2=L/(c-v)$$
Your notation is confusing. Why are you putting primes (') on your variables here? Why t' instead of t?
I'll use your earlier notation. The times are different, like you said:
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
T_{1} &=& \frac{L}{c + v} \,,
T_{2} &=& \frac{L}{c - v} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
$$
But the distances travelled by the dog are also different:
$$
\begin{eqnarray}
X_{1} &=& \frac{L}{1 + v/c} \,,
X_{2} &=& \frac{L}{1 - v/c} \,.
\end{eqnarray}
$$
in both cases, $$(X_{i})^{2} \,-\, (cT_{i})^{2} \,=\, 0$$.
You've always had a problem doing frame changes. That was clear from your touting of Andrew Banks's work.
You must be aware you've not read enough relativity, that you've never been able to do simple homework problems expected of undergraduates learning special relativity (likewise for logic and countability). Yet you presume, without evidence and even contrary to explicit evidence, you have capabilities in such things. You know you've never done any relativity yet you continue with this laughable attitude.
Yes. Know what else is moving with velocity v? From [POST=2928447]Masterov's problem[/POST], which I was replying to (emphasis added):
That makes L the contracted length, and L' the rest length.
Correction, you're the one who doesn't understand.chinglu said:You do not seem to understand.
You do not measure your frame in units of the moving frame.
Yes.Masterov: I'm curious? Are there public science forums in your native tongue?
Quantum information. Mostly I've been doing theoretical work related to quantum cryptography in the last 18 months or so.What's been your main area of scientific research? If you wouldn't mind saying.
I have no idea what you're talking about. If you know a quantity in one reference frame, then with enough information you can work out the quantity in another frame. That's what the Lorentz transformation is for. In this case, $$L$$ is given in the first frame I'm considering, and you can work out $$L'$$ in a boosted frame that matches the velocity of the travellers. You get $$L' = \gamma L$$. I gave a [POST=2959149]full, systematic derivation from the Lorentz transform here[/POST]. If you think the result is wrong, you are welcome to point out an error in that.You do not seem to understand.
You do not measure your frame in units of the moving frame.
You measure them in units of your own frame.
I don't think you're qualified to be telling anyone here what SR is and isn't.That is not SR.
No, I'm going to use knowledge and ability. Concepts you seem unfamiliar with.Are you going to use ESP?
Thanks for your reply.Quantum information. Mostly I've been doing theoretical work related to quantum cryptography in the last 18 months or so.
I have no idea what you're talking about. If you know a quantity in one reference frame, then with enough information you can work out the quantity in another frame. That's what the Lorentz transformation is for. In this case, $$L$$ is given in the first frame I'm considering, and you can work out $$L'$$ in a boosted frame that matches the velocity of the travellers. You get $$L' = \gamma L$$. I gave a [POST=2959149]full, systematic derivation from the Lorentz transform here[/POST]. If you think the result is wrong, you are welcome to point out an error in that.
I don't think you're qualified to be telling anyone here what SR is and isn't.
Please look at LT and prove your case.
A frame measures its own context and then LT translates this to the other frame coordinates.
In short, you are frame mixing.
You must use your frame measurements and then use LT to translate.
So, your equations are all wrong. You cannot use the other frames information for your own measurements.