The lack of experimental results in the literature clearly indicates that the experiment contradicts the SRT.
What terrible logic you use. Do you honestly think that's a sound argument? Firstly it implies there's a global conspiracy, crossing national boundaries, that
everyone with access to any kind of particle accelerator is in on. If only scientist were that collaborative! Secondly there are plenty of experiments which do test relativistic predictions about energy, mass, motion etc. If relativity weren't accurate we couldn't build accelerators as the acceleration behaviour of particles wouldn't be as expected and the design of the machines would be wrong.
Enough to heat a piece of lead in a linear accelerator to make sure the bankruptcy SRT to have a place.
Your sentence construction is not sufficiently good for that to make sense.
Mr. Liangzao FAN clearly showed by the experiment that the formula: $$\Delta E=q\Delta U$$ is not valid for relativistic charged particles.
Except he hasn't.
Therefore approval of physicists that they were able to disperse the charged particles to energies measured GeV and (even more so) TeV is a lie.
Do you live in some world filled with paranoia and conspiracies or something?
Energy of the particles in the LHC beam is only slightly greater than it of the energy any most inexpensive particle accelerators.
A claim which is demonstrably false. Relativity is used to predict the radiative energy produced by accelerating charged particles at near light speed around a circle. Accelerators are built to take that into account, it's the whole reason the LHC accelerates protons and not electrons! If relativity were wrong in the way you claim the LHC couldn't function. Furthermore there's more complicated tests of relativity. Scattering differential cross sections are calculated using Lorentz transformations. The high velocity means length contraction alters the charge density of the beam bunches, which alters the scattering behaviour of collisions. It's literally a homework problem for someone learning quantum field theory to calculate how Lorentz transforms impact on the predictions, as you can do the calculation using relativity or you can make the simplification of assuming everything follows Newton (ie time and space are absolute). Experiments confirm the relativistic predictions and falsify the Newtonian ones. As I said, this isn't some convoluted complicated model only a handful of people know and thus everyone else just takes their word for it, but rather something thousands of people learn every year in universities doing quantum field theory lecture courses.
I know how to do such calculations! I know people who write papers where they compare such calculations to the
real LHC data. There's no conspiracy, no hiding of truth, no lying about relativity, the models
work.
This is a occasion for grand-scandal, since for the construction of the LHC have been spent a lot of money.
No, it isn't. It wouldn't be a scandal even if the LHC found nothing. CERN has spent considerable amounts of money advancing technology in the areas of distributed computing, low temperature electronics, superconductors, superfluids, high speed sensors, precision timing and more besides. They did that because the technology to build the LHC didn't exist when it was designed, CERN had to pay for the research to be done to make the LHC a reality. From those technologies new applications will follow. The internet developed from the rudimentary networking CERN developed to spread it's data around for researchers to examine. Even if CERN never found another particle again the fact it lead to the internet, a multi-trillion dollar global telecommunications and data processing system which has changed the face of human civilisation forever makes it worthwhile.
The fear of scandal is causes the physicists to do report about that does not exist in reality.
I have met the person who was head of the LHC research division. He likes to tell a story about how when LEP was being built Margaret Thatcher visited CERN and when she met him she asked "What do you do here?" and he replied "I try to find things theorists don't want to find". He considered it his
job to find faults in models, to highlight where science is mistaken and to then try to understand it.
I've told you before, every single physicist would LOVE to prove relativity wrong if it's wrong, if they had irrefutable evidence. It would make their name
forever! The man (or woman) who corrected Einstein, Dirac, Hawking? Eternal fame! And this whole "Oh they might lose their job!" thing is nonsense too. The person who kills relativity will have grants coming out of their ears. Fame and fortune the likes of which science has never seen before! Plus when a paradigm is knocked over it gives everyone a chance to make a name for themselves by building the replacement. So there is no incentive for people not to kill special relativity if they can prove it wrong, in fact there's every incentive to yell it from the roof tops. I know I would. But only provided
real viable evidence was there, not just ignorant conspiracy theories.
I mean the message that the physicists were able to obtain Higgs Boson.
You're now into the realms of denying demonstrable fact. You're sounding
insane.
I am convinced that neutrinos actually move faster than light.
And some people are convinced Jesus speaks to them in their dreams. In both their case and yours
evidence is everything.
Everything. And you have none.
OPERA experiments declared erroneous under the pressure of SRT lobby.
This lobby have a great resource that allows they to apply the methods of Medieval Inquisition in science.
Paranoid delusions. You're providing nothing but paranoid ignorant delusions.
